this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2026
421 points (95.9% liked)

politics

30004 readers
2376 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 147 points 1 day ago (5 children)

If only they had voted for the candidates who wanted a strong social safety net, rather than the ones that wanted to fuck everyone who isn't part of the 0.1%, maybe they wouldn't have to worry now...

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 52 points 1 day ago (4 children)

And the idea of a safety net has been around for a long time, in various forms, yet somehow helping everyone has always been a bad thing to do.

[–] YoureHotCupCake@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

You can't just give everyone a social safety net, then black people and gays would benefit and we can't be having that in our christian values nation. Its better if we all suffer instead to avoid helping the wrong people.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

Its better if we all suffer instead to avoid helping the wrong people.

This should be carved into America's tombstone.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Helping people is good to conservatives too... so long as you mean one guy helping an old lady cross the street. Once you apply that idea to anything more than one individual's actions within the confines of the community in which they live then conservatives start opposing the idea. I've never heard a logical explanation as to why that is.

[–] Wrufieotnak@feddit.org 3 points 13 hours ago

I mean, isn't the explanation pretty simple:

They reserve the right of the individual to be an egoistic, uncaring asshole.

After reading your comment again: you meant how they applaud the individual act but can't explain why they don't want it to be a applied to the whole community? In that case I agree, no logical explanation.

[–] TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Because somehow enough people were convinced anything that wasn't democracy was communism but also that capitalist fascism is actually democracy

yet somehow helping everyone has always been a bad thing to do

Except when you're at church pretending to listen to what the preacher is saying about the gospels

[–] Janx@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That sounds like socialism, which is the same as communism, since they don't understand that either. All they know is that they lived through the Red Scare, and grew up thinking evil Soviet Communists were going to nuke the world...

All they know is that they lived through the Red Scare

Are living in the Red Scare. It never ended, even though the Cold War did. They're still preaching the same anti-USSR propaganda to the kids today that they were in the 60s. You need look no further than the Republicans calling Obama a communist because he took a course on Communism in college. You know, the one that every college student was required to take during the Cold War and that every Republican politician also took.

[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

bernie was who we needed - instead we got trump ala hillary

[–] Yliaster@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thinking voting could save a country like America is so out of touch it's cringe. America needs revolution.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Who's gonna lead it? You?

All these armchair revolutionaries.

[–] Yliaster@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago

The same people who are going to "vote", could.