this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2025
567 points (97.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

9805 readers
1842 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Your comment is a generalization though it is true that Europeans largely washed their hair with water, vinegar and/or egg yolk prior to the colonial era. Shampoo became known to Europeans through India. The word Shampoo comes from the Sanskrit champo which means to press or massage. What was used in India at the time was a more effective combination of coconut oil and various herbs.

Dean Mahomed (1759–1851) was a British Indian traveller, soldier, and entrepreneur who brought both curry and shampoo to the UK.

In 1814, Mahomed and his family moved back to Brighton and opened the first commercial "shampooing" vapour masseur bath in England, "Mahomed's Baths", on the site now occupied by the Queen's Hotel. Located on the seafront, the luxurious bathhouse offered therapeutic baths and shampooing with Indian oils.[2] He described the treatment in a local paper as "The Indian Medicated Vapour Bath, a cure to many diseases and giving full relief when every thing fails; particularly Rheumatic and paralytic, gout, stiff joints, old sprains, lame legs, aches and pains in the joints".[40] Jane Daly, Mahomed's wife, was also actively involved in the bathhouse business. Adverts suggested that, like her husband, Jane possessed "the art of shampooing" and that she superintended the Ladies Baths.[2] The business was an immediate success and Dean Mahomed became known as "Dr. Brighton". Hospitals referred patients to him and he was appointed as shampooing surgeon to both King George IV and William IV.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dean_Mahomed

See "Introduction of Shampooing to Europe"

The fact that hair would look mangy after a few days, especially with the use of a poorly pH balanced hair cleansing with water, vinegar and egg yolk, is part of the reason large wigs were popular in early modern Europe.

[–] mushroomman_toad@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Soap is very different than the shampoo/conditioner ritual. One could argue that natural oils are cleaner than factory oils.

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

This was a time when people had massive bushes and, once shampoo was introduced to Europe, it was quickly normalized for use of cleaning pubic hair too (particularly once it was commercially mass produced).

Soaps/body washes today have a much better pH balance so they don't completely wreck hair but back then they were so alkaline that long term use would be damaging.

The high pH opens the cuticle, which can increase friction, cause tangling, and make hair feel rough. Repeated use can lead to split ends, especially on coarse hair. It also caused significant skin irritation by stripping the body of protective oils.

There's no doubt that genitalia became less off putting for Europeans when commercial shampoo (the original intellectual property having come from India, specifically ayurveda) became widespread. The legacy of which is clear in the fact we continue to use the anglicized version of the Sanskrit word champo to refer to it, even to this day.

[–] hakase@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Champo is Hindi, not Sanskrit.

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

You're right it's derived from the Sanskrit capayati चपयति

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

High pH for the wash, low pH for the conditioner. Baking soda'n'water, water rinse, vinegar rinse.

Works great.

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

You will certainly strip the hair of natural lipids with this approach. Likely irritate the scalp as well.

Ayurvedic/Indian shampoo (the precursor of current day shampoo) contained antioxidants, vitamins, amino acids, emollients to lock in moisture and surfactants to create a lather. All of which are key components of the shampoo that we use today.

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

When I was doing it, I did it maybe once a week at most.

[–] DakRalter@thelemmy.club 1 points 2 months ago

I tried the bicarb no-poo stuff for a couple of weeks, it was disgusting. Left my scalp feeling manky and gross. It's way too alkaline to be good for your scalp. Soapnuts/soapwort worked better. The vinegar rinse was good stuff though.

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You argue that. I'm gonna argue that beans are fruit.

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Are they not?

What about "beans, beans; the magical fruit. The more you eat the more you toot" lol

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Technically beans are seeds and the shell they grow in is a fruit.