this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2025
567 points (97.6% liked)
Microblog Memes
9805 readers
1842 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Your comment is a generalization though it is true that Europeans largely washed their hair with water, vinegar and/or egg yolk prior to the colonial era. Shampoo became known to Europeans through India. The word Shampoo comes from the Sanskrit champo which means to press or massage. What was used in India at the time was a more effective combination of coconut oil and various herbs.
Dean Mahomed (1759–1851) was a British Indian traveller, soldier, and entrepreneur who brought both curry and shampoo to the UK.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dean_Mahomed
See "Introduction of Shampooing to Europe"
The fact that hair would look mangy after a few days, especially with the use of a poorly pH balanced hair cleansing with water, vinegar and egg yolk, is part of the reason large wigs were popular in early modern Europe.
Soap is very different than the shampoo/conditioner ritual. One could argue that natural oils are cleaner than factory oils.
This was a time when people had massive bushes and, once shampoo was introduced to Europe, it was quickly normalized for use of cleaning pubic hair too (particularly once it was commercially mass produced).
Soaps/body washes today have a much better pH balance so they don't completely wreck hair but back then they were so alkaline that long term use would be damaging.
The high pH opens the cuticle, which can increase friction, cause tangling, and make hair feel rough. Repeated use can lead to split ends, especially on coarse hair. It also caused significant skin irritation by stripping the body of protective oils.
There's no doubt that genitalia became less off putting for Europeans when commercial shampoo (the original intellectual property having come from India, specifically ayurveda) became widespread. The legacy of which is clear in the fact we continue to use the anglicized version of the Sanskrit word champo to refer to it, even to this day.
Champo is Hindi, not Sanskrit.
You're right it's derived from the Sanskrit capayati चपयति
High pH for the wash, low pH for the conditioner. Baking soda'n'water, water rinse, vinegar rinse.
Works great.
You will certainly strip the hair of natural lipids with this approach. Likely irritate the scalp as well.
Ayurvedic/Indian shampoo (the precursor of current day shampoo) contained antioxidants, vitamins, amino acids, emollients to lock in moisture and surfactants to create a lather. All of which are key components of the shampoo that we use today.
When I was doing it, I did it maybe once a week at most.
I tried the bicarb no-poo stuff for a couple of weeks, it was disgusting. Left my scalp feeling manky and gross. It's way too alkaline to be good for your scalp. Soapnuts/soapwort worked better. The vinegar rinse was good stuff though.
You argue that. I'm gonna argue that beans are fruit.
Are they not?
What about "beans, beans; the magical fruit. The more you eat the more you toot" lol
Technically beans are seeds and the shell they grow in is a fruit.