this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2025
971 points (99.5% liked)

Political Memes

9962 readers
1070 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 34 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I feel like too many people took the wrong lesson from The Boy Who Cried Wolf and believe the lesson was "always believe the liars because one day you might be eaten by wolves when the liar who is famous for lying actually tells the truth for once and you don't believe them," and not "you shouldn't lie because eventually no one will believe you when you tell the truth."

[–] oddlyqueer@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Or people who say "Well, even a broken clock is right twice a day" with the implication that sure, they're often wrong but what if they aren't this time? Shouldn't we at least take them seriously just in case they randomly got it right? I've never wanted to physically shake someone so badly before.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I thought that expression is for when they're unexpectedly right about something, like MTG and releasing the Epstein files.

[–] oddlyqueer@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

It is, but the point of the expression is (I think) that you shouldn't give credence to an unreliable source just because they happen to call one correctly, e.g. "I know that clock says 2:15 and it's actually 2:15 now, but that's just a coincidence because the clock always says 2:15, don't be bamboozled into thinking the clock sometimes gives useful information, it does not. It is never to be relied upon, even if it is 2:15, because there's no way to tell just from that clock. Use a different one". MTG deserves zero respect or credibility just because she happens to be "right" (for now) about the Epstein affair, because she has demonstrated so clearly in the past that she prioritizes saying what will keep her in office over any genuine concern for protecting children from violence. People say "but even MTG wants the Epstein files released" like it is some barometer of the clarity of the situation, but it also carries the implication that Greene's opinion suddenly carries weight. NO it does not, fuck that clock and fuck MTG, no one should care at all what she thinks, on any issue.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah, but what if she's also right about the Jewish space lasers? /s

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 months ago

Sounds like an abusive relationship imo.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 4 points 2 months ago
[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago

Wait, did the townspeople all get eaten by wolves in that story? I did not remember the story ending that way. I thought it was just the boy... Or just his sheep.