this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2025
226 points (98.7% liked)

politics

26585 readers
2003 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world 50 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The indictment specifically accuses Abughazaleh, among others, of banging aggressively on the windows, hood and other areas of the agent’s car, pushing against it to “hinder and impede its movement” and etching the word “PIG” on the car.

This is so dumb. Oh no! The ICE agent was scared! Almost exactly like how he makes everyone else feel!

Kat is a really good voice to have and this is the dumbest thing you can throw against her. Criticize her about how she's not running in the district she lives in, how she moved to Illinois from Texas and within a very short time decided to run for congress ~~against a Democratic congresswoman who the community of the district genuinely likes and has been rather progressive~~ ( I have been corrected, the congresswoman is retiring). About how she's acting like she knows a lot about the district saying she lives right next to a bus line that is a few stops away from that district despite the fact that bus line doesn't go to that district. Not this horseshit.

[–] Sconrad122@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

She running for an open seat though? Or is one of her opponents a congresswoman in a neighboring district or a state congresswoman?

[–] LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Edit at the top: the seat she is running for is going to be empty so that's at least one area of criticism she shouldn't face.

~~She is running in a seat currently held by a Democratic congresswoman who, to be fair, has been in office for a while. It's a primary and she's running against her. Not an open seat unless the current congresswoman has recently announced she won't be running which would have had to happen in the last couple weeks and I think is unlikely.~~

[–] Sconrad122@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This was in May, Jan Schakowsky, the congresswoman for IL-09, announced shw would not run for reelection in 2026. So not really the past few weeks. Am I missing something? https://schakowsky.house.gov/media/press-releases/schakowsky-announces-she-will-not-seek-re-election-2026.

[–] LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Ah I see, you're not missing something. I was basing it off of her AMA on reddit from a long while ago now when Jan hadn't announced her retirement yet.

Still think she deserves criticism for running in a district she doesn't live in and for moving from texas to Illinois and within a year running for Congress there. But she at least is running for an empty seat. There are also several other candidates in the race who are just as progressive who actually live in the district.

She challenged a solid left ish area instead of where she lives where she could've pushed more progressive. Bothers me.