this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2025
639 points (98.8% liked)
People Twitter
8655 readers
1056 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
OK, slitting throats killed the enemy. Fine.
Why cut off dicks after this? Strange paraphilia? Taking dicks as trophies? Dehumanise the enemy? Imagine going to the effort on an exposed battlefield to get a corpse in position to be able to cut off the trousers and find the dick under the clothes to cut it off in a bloody mess (chopping off a dick from a fresh corpse will bleed like crazy). WTF
They didn't state the order these things happened in...
Pinning down 2 live soldiers enough to chop off a dick sounds even more difficult!
They were likely outnumbered and being injured during the whole process.
The VC also could have removed them after being dead. I think it was less about they wanted to do it and more about psychological warfare. The whole platoon will be talking about those poor dismembered men and they may be worried theirs is next.
It doesn't to me if you walk up on them sleeping. If you have 4 people it's easy peasy, 2 put their weight on their face or chest and the other two go to chopping.