this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2025
587 points (99.2% liked)

politics

26585 readers
1881 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (12 children)

Wouldn't it be nice to just support human rights? The one thing all of these groups have in common is their humanhood.

Well at least until we reach a 'body of Theseus' point in technological augmentation. Then we may need to rebrand 'human rights' to 'consciousness rights' or something more catchy.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (9 children)

We don't even know what "consciousness" is, let alone any kind of "consciousness rights".

Like, it's just not something really anyone's been looking into, with the exception of probably the legit worlds smartest human who "retired" from physics 30 years ago

Like, one old dude dicking around in retirement, and a couple of associates.

There's a long way to go before we can replicate a consciousness.

[–] JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Physicists are often pointed to as the 'smartest' among us, yet when they turn to other fields, their genius isn't always transferable. I personally would prefer psychologists or philosophers to determine what is consciousness.

Also, I wasn't suggesting we replicate consciousness. I was touching on whether a human is still a human if, to put it extremely, neck down is machinery instead of biology. I might be okay with a Wall-e body.

[–] Rezoie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

reminds me of the game soma by the authors of amnesia

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)