this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
754 points (98.8% liked)

People Twitter

8655 readers
857 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 90 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The one that lists sheets is at least using a verifiable metric. It's better than the "right rolls of unspecified size are more than 39 different rolls of unspecified size".

Still silly because no one knows how many sheets they use before changing the roll, but at least it's reasonable silly.

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 30 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Isn't it the same problem tho, since they can make the sheets smaller and say there's more without actually offering a longer roll?

[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 29 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We need legally defined toilet paper roll standards.

[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Lets setup some ISO standards for shit wipers.

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

I would be shocked if there isn't already one. The trick is getting companies to adhere to it.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Helps that they tend to be square-ish, there's a subsection of people who would notice immediately if you can't fold perfect paper cranes from a single sheet while you're pooping.

[–] Lojcs@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

pretty sure they are rectangles

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago

Oh, totally. It's by no means a good measurement, it's just the only one that's in some way tied to anything tangible. "8=39" doesn't mean anything.

[–] Fermion@mander.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Which matters more total kg or mm^2^ ?

[–] huppakee@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Kg for sure, i wouldn't trust tp with a low cost per mm²

[–] Fermion@mander.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago

I also don't trust a toilet paper with a low gsm.

Maybe we need both a gsm and total weight labeling.

[–] whosepoopisonmybuttocks@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The label usually says total surface area in the package. The stores near me break the price down to cost per unit of area, as well. This really untangles the 'how much should I pay for a quadrahedroll vs a dodecca butt sphere" worth of paper?

[–] ArchEngel@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

Username checks out!