this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2025
502 points (94.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

9797 readers
2069 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

5 generations in 120 years is unusual?

[โ€“] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 51 minutes ago (1 children)

I thought you meant you have 5 generations alive right now. That's unusual. 4 is less unusual but also not the majority, I imagine.

But yeah, that's not what you meant so nevermind. ๐Ÿ‘

[โ€“] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 35 minutes ago

yeah, i realize i was unclear about the period of time originally and that i probably originally implied 4-5 generations since 1945. but my point was less about lengths of specific generations and just that some families reproduce faster.

on my side of the family, currently 4 generations alive but the first of generation 5 is due in about 6 months. my wife's side of the family, there are 3 generations alive, the last of the first generation we're counting will last at most 5 more years and no one's having kids for at least a decade, so it's soon to just be 2 generations alive.

demography is weird.

[โ€“] ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

7 would be unusual, 4-6 seems normal