Those being anarchists, not socialists. There have been shitloads of anarchist communes working perfectly, until some external force fucks them up or reclaims the land or whatever.

I asked specifically for socialist ones.

[–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

And you were given a dozen that you ignored

[–] h3rmit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Not really, I'm reading more about them, aside from the USSR and Cuba I'm not that familiar aside from some general knowledge in them. Neither Cuba nor the USSR I would consider free. Just is debatable, but I can see the point. But I should probably read more about the rest of the examples

[–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 1 points 12 hours ago

🙄

[–] anarchaos@lemmy.ml 1 points 13 hours ago

anarchism is socialist. it's often called libertarian socialist.