Any bug bounty program that isn't part of the source control repo website (GitHub/Lab...) Will not enjoy the deserved exposure for such a program, but, the day that GitHub realize this - they will want a cut of that deal
Selfhosted
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
-
No spam posting.
-
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
-
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
-
No trolling.
-
No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
There's a couple online if you look around, but they're all pretty small: Opire.dev oss.issuehunt.io/issues Boss.dev/issues/open And probably dozens more
And as a cautionary tale, look what happened to bountysource
Idk of any but I'm interested, commenting to add traffic 👍
That's cool but as soon as there are such kind of bounties, there is an incentive to hold back any useful and wanted features to keep the money flowing. It's a double edged sword
What about a way to donate (held in reserve for that purpose?) money after the fact for specific commits, and then have a way to indicate which things you'd be most likely to donate to going forward if they are completed? This would mean less reliable payments since there wouldn't be a guarantee any given contribution would result in a payout, but there wouldn't be any disincentive to work on things and there would be a general idea of what donators want. Plus doing it that way would eliminate the need for a manual escrow process.
GitCoin exists and has been pretty successful in the past.
Though I suspect it's not what you're looking for. I don't see bounties on their site anymore and their focus has been mostly in the crypto space.
+1 for engagement