this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2025
147 points (90.2% liked)

Technology

77084 readers
2484 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] toffi@piefed.social 53 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

"We've now constructed the doomsday machine from the popular novel 'Don't build the doomsday machine'"

[–] zqwzzle@lemmy.ca 30 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I like the original “torment nexus” phrasing better.

[–] toffi@piefed.social 21 points 2 weeks ago

Ah I was quoting from memory. You're right the torment nexus line is better.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 3 points 2 weeks ago

You have an overly broad definition of "doomsday machine."

[–] Lembot_0005@lemy.lol 35 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The result is nice and cool. It is the level of modern journalism that is disturbing.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I worry about it. Every year I see more articles with sloppy mistakes that could be caught by any half-drunk editor phoning his job in. Sites springing up publishing 90% slop clearly so someone can keep writing. Not to mention the risks to journalism in a country where the president threatens any group whose speech he doesn't like.

As (i think) Parenti said, now is the time of monsters. Cool robot though. That, genuinely, is crazy impressive.

[–] northernlights@lemmy.today 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean in this instance, if you look at the thumbnail of the author and then follow his link, he looks not a day over 16.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Im middle-aged, anyone under 30 looks like a baby to me 😅 babies can be journalists as long as they've got ethics and a good editor

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Seriously. How many ways are there to make an humanoid robot out of stainless steel and aluminium?

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 28 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

What clickbait. Apparently any vaguely capable humanoid robot is a "straight-up Terminator"?

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

If you can't handle me at my Roy Baty you don't deserve me at my Pris Stratton

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

That's the most "Terminator" looking robot I've ever seen.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

They meant that in terms of infiltration they're becoming more humanoid at an exponential level

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Why does it have boobs though? Is that like extra space For batteries? Why not a bellybutton if we are Going for realism?

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 31 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Because humans will put tits on anything. I watched a movie about sentient cockroaches, and the girl cockroaches all had tits.

[–] tgcoldrockn@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

to be fair to the addition of bazongas, those characters are more 'humans in cockroach costumes' than 'sentient cockroaches.'

[–] Gonzako@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

We all love some badongadongs tho

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

Because when humans see a robot with boobs, the comments turn into "hey this robot has tits", and when they don't, the comments turn into "humanity is going to be euthanised by the machines".

[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That's their target market, sex dolls.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 2 points 2 weeks ago

I'd say "found the bot", but even bots are familiar with why boobs appeal to human sensibilities.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In a follow-up event to prove it was a robot, He Xiaopeng had its leg skin cut open in front of a live audience. The robot then walked off the stage.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 2 weeks ago

that one was AI video i believe.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

"We're at a point now where robots can move more sensually than Taylor Swift."

What?

[–] SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 weeks ago

It was a Reddit comment in response to this video (Catbox alt).

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Joe Wilkins clearly has a thing for robots.

[–] confuser@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

Any mention of sexy robots deserves mention of sexy robots man

Hajime sorayama

[–] unpossum@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 weeks ago

That looks more like a Terminatrix

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 13 points 2 weeks ago

Gen 1 Synth lookin' motherfucker.

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I’m not saying this because she’s a billionaire, and this is really nothing against her, her looks, or her music, but I never found Taylor Swift to be, like, sexy. She’s quite beautiful and very talented but she’s just not who comes to mind when I think of slinky sexiness.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

She's a bit stiff IMHO.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I get you! She's extraordinarily beautiful, and not just in a blonde hair/blue eyes kinda way. I have an admiration for any man or woman who works hard to maximize their appearance. My wife is like that. She won't win any beauty pageants, but she is as attractive as it's possible to be for her. It's fucking hard work and Swift could do nothing to be any more attractive.

Turns out I like her music too! Kids listening to something, "That's cool, who's that?"

But sexy? Maybe she's too perfect? I like a woman that's "off" in some way. Maybe a big nose, wide-spaced eyes, pouchy mouth, gimme some imperfections that stand out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] flightyhobler@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"We're at a point now where robots can move more sensually than Taylor Swift."

That's a low bar

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

So they skipped the Dalek phase, huh?

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 5 points 2 weeks ago

Wheeled robots have been the norm for decades, we didn't skip that.

[–] LordMayor@piefed.social 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Didn’t Daleks have little squishy aliens inside them?

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 5 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, Daleks are not robots, they're squishy tentacle space nazis inside mobile battle casing pepperpots that they call War Machines. The Terminator T1 however looks vaguely like such a pepperpot if you squint and are Doctor Who brained.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

What is the endgame here? People are supposed to buy these? To do what?

The took the fabric off a mechanical device to reveal it was a mechanical device. Disturbing?

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I'd buy one if it would help fight off ice agents.

[–] unpossum@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago

I read ice giants and thought I’d missed a headline today

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

To do what?

Chores and other stuff we don't want to/can't do. This has been the dream for decades now, so many old encyclopedias with "future tech" chapters show robots caring for people, sometimes as caregivers (for old people, or blind etc), sometimes as entertainers.

[–] filcuk@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Except regular people will struggle to afford food out whilst these will be cleaning rich people's yachts.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"We're at a point now where robots can move more sensually than Taylor Swift."

What a weird fucking tagline on an article that insinuates a robotic dystopian future.

Although there are some weird horny undertones, so I guess it checks out. Still, weird article all around

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

They know what grabs people's attention.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Press X to doubt

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 3 points 2 weeks ago

I won't die to anything wearing crocs!!

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

tbh, with those hips I might eventually join the robots

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sims@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago

This seems to be the really interesting part: "..the bot also contains the “first all-solid-state battery in the industry,” as opposed to the liquid electrolyte typically found in lithium-ion batteries. Solid-state batteries are considered the “holy grail” for electric vehicle development .."

[–] jimerson@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Am I missing something, or did they just dress up a woman with a prosthetic leg to resemble an android, and remove the dressing around the prosthetic to "prove" she isn't human?

load more comments
view more: next ›