this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
810 points (98.6% liked)

Fuck AI

4728 readers
935 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 97 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

We shouldn't be entertaining a bail out at all, regardless of any social systems being funded.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (6 children)

Who is "we"?

It seems like this is the usual ultra privileged people who violently control society under a fundamentally evil system.

That's not me and I doubt it's you.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Came here to said the same thing. I get what she's going for but no, there shouldn't be a bailout at all.

[–] drzoidberg@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If a government ever needs to bail out a company, that company should be rolled into the government as a utility or service, and its CEO/board should be released with no compensation, and barred from holding similar positions for 10 years.

The bank bailout, airline bailout, automotive bailout, mortgage bailout, etc., should have all been rolled into the federal government, or been completely shut down. If you run your business so shittily that you cannot function without a government bailout, then that business shouldn't exist.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

You're overcomplicating things. There's no reason for a bailout in an ostensibly capitalist economy, period. I appreciate your comment but bailouts shouldn't exist at all

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Triumph@fedia.io 57 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Socialized risk, privatized rewards.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Same as it ever was. Hail corporate!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I can feel myself being radicalized in real-time by the shamelessness with which they engineer the system to rob everyone not in their country club.

And by the video I watched this morning about who Jay Gould was and who Andrew Carnegie REALLY was.

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And at least Carnegie built libraries, parks, and schools with some of his plunder. Modern capitalists don't even do that.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Carnegie was kind of like an earlier version of Bill Gates. Charitable in public to cover being as shitty as the rest of them in private.

[–] Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Id like to watch this, have a channel name?

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

@DamonCassidy Why Billionaires HATE the Working Class. The Gould and Carnegie (mostly Gould) bit is only a small part of the video.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If a business fails it fails. Period. No government aid.

If a business that fails is vital to the economy, it is still not bailed out. It is nationalized and turned into a government service. The people who drove it into failure get nothing (except possibly jail time if there was malfeasance).

Later, if there is someone who shows evidence of being able to run the business successfully, perhaps hand it off as a crown corporation for a bit to that person.

But at no point should failed businesses be given government money to keep them alive. That rewards massive failure only.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

"But what about the workers there?"

Let the workers buy up the company.

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 4 points 2 weeks ago

That's another great option. Turn them into worker-owned syndicates.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 3 points 2 weeks ago

Seeing that more and more in my area. I love seeing Worker-Owned.

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 21 points 2 weeks ago

The rich don’t like that she breathes air.

[–] aarch0x40@piefed.social 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

But AI is critial to the rise of Idiocracy!!

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The computer did that auto layoff thing!

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 7 points 2 weeks ago

You are an unfit mother. Carl's Jr believes no child should go hungry. Your child will now be placed into the custody of Carl's Jr. Carl's Jr: Fuck you! I'm eating!

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

In my lifetime, i've bailed out the housing market, the auto industry, the airline industry, and probably something else they hid from the media.

I refuse to help bailout these crappy AI companies that just steal from everyone and want to take jobs away from hard working americans.

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Unfortunately it's not your choice to make. A guy who couldn't manage to run a casino, literally an infinite money hack, is running the show. I wouldn't put much faith in him if I were you.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh its better than that.

The casino was being run brilliantly.

by his wife

and in his petty, infinite jealousy, he kicked her out, and ran the casino... as you said, an infinite money printer, into the ground.. because he couldnt stand his wife being successful.

[–] TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

That's the least shocking thing I've ever heard

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago

A guy who couldn’t manage to run a casino...

after multiple attempts*

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago

Ahahah, like you have a choice

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

don't forget trillion dollar wall street bailout, or the multi trillion dollar covid bailout.

or the ppp loans which went to republican allies who didnt need them, used them for anything but paycheck protections, and never paid them back, which is a bailout in everything but name.

[–] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

and Silicon Valley Bank, two years ago

[–] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Remember that these CEO's are the ones (along with their pay-for talking heads in the media) that will, with the zeal and energy of a pentecostal minister on crack, tell us all that socialism will destroy innovation, reward the lazy, and put a bigger burden on the middle class tax payer. All while doing everything their bank accounts can do to build a system where they get more and more of our tax money - because of reasons.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

I still don't (figuratively) understand why the government has to subsidise a capitalistic system. Risk is a part of it, so why not embrace it? Is it because they're too rich to fail? Why is that reserved for the poors?

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

because all that talk of "risk" and "effort" is propaganda.

they're just making up excuses to why they are on top and why we should stay at the bottom. they actually take no appreciable risk, while we have to if we want to make a real investment.

[–] Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

At the very least the government should then own part of the companies they bail out. If they are so essential and unable to stay afloat on their own...

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

The car manufacturer bank bailout was treated as a loan. They did technically pay the government back+interest.

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

yes, and in most sane countries that's exactly what they do

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

Because they are “too big to fail” because we have lack of regulation allowing for monopolies controlling vital infrastructure and aspects of society and government.

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

They have the money to be able to change the rules and the lack of morality to be willing to change them.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

AOC bailed out the rail industry when she voted against the rail unions that wanted to strike.

[–] GhostedIC@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

Actually, was that a senate vote? I thought it was an executive action.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 9 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

AIPAC/Billionaires donor keep her and BERNIE and by extension crockett from gaining any significant influence in the party.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The rich won't care what some phony politician said... They'll still get their bailout.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

exactly what i was thinking. no one will stop a possible bailout except the us people.

and the us people doesn't seem interested in this effort.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Stop bailing out corporations. “Free market “ means fail and imprisonment of everyone who is committing white collar crimes including politicians and billionaires

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

Don't worry, it won't be "entertained", it will simply be done

And then the bailout money won't go to saving these shiny turd companies, it'll all go to the CEOs and founders and that's about it

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

I demand my economy be based on the ability of computers to generate images of comically obese men farting on each other!

So you're saying there's a bailout

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

There was at least a coherent rationale for the GFC bank bailouts - if you let parts of the finance system collapse a) real people lose lots of savings, and b) it might destabilise the whole system, and cause a domino effect (not saying I agree with it)

That rationale doesn't apply for AI (though there will certainly be investment banks that collapse, I guess)

[–] llama@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

Bailout for what even? There's no plan for ever having profitability and the amount of jobs directly working on AI is miniscule compared to the amount of jobs displaced by AI.

load more comments
view more: next ›