this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2026
647 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

85245 readers
4407 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Vinylraupe@lemmy.zip 8 points 22 hours ago

EU be like: Feels good to be a gangsta.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 129 points 1 day ago (3 children)

this is how stupid, self centered, petty, controlling, and anti-consumer, anti-fan Nintendo is.

They'd rather incur the costs of running two assemblies side by side, than simply give everyone access to a means of easily repair their switch.

They'd rather spend tons of extra money, than do anything beneficial for someone they arent forced by law to give it to.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago

Thos is far from a Nintendo exclusive problem.

It is the way entire industries are going (and have neen going for decades).

It's only strong consumer protection laws that stand in their way.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

They’d rather incur the costs of running two assemblies side by side, than simply give everyone access to a means of easily repair their switch.

I guarantee you they've made the calculation and found that the cost is well offset by the profits gained from the inability of other markets to repair their owned switches.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Turns out companies would rather reverse planned obsolescence than lose access to an entire geographic market. I wonder what else we could get these capitalist fascists to do if we united and forced them into a corner?

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But what if it goes wrong, and the parasites vacate our area, leaving room for vibrant innovative new companies to thrive?!

[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

😱 oh no!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mrodri89@lemmy.zip 73 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Thats crazy to make it EU only.

[–] groet@feddit.org 34 points 1 day ago (5 children)

In the EU bottle caps have to be attached to the bottle so they stay together when thrown away. Everyone working in recycling and especially people working in stuff like river cleanups praise how this is a gigantic improvement. It is universally a good thing.

Even Coca Cola used it in advertising to sell how environmentally friendly they are (by not breaking the law). However they are only doing it in countries where it is legally required and nowhere else.

[–] vladmech@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I had no idea this was a thing; just read up on it and what a cool mandate.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Even apple went world wide when Europe forced them into C

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Complain to your fascist government. lol good luck.

[–] Folstar@lemmus.org 55 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I love that the overwhelming response to this is getting mad at Nintendo for complying with EU law instead of getting mad at the US Government for lagging severely behind on consumer rights. Small wonder things aren't getting better.

[–] darkangelazuarl@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)

Id assume bots are being used to show outrage about them changing it in the EU unlike here. Theres no downside to an upgrade like this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How long do you think it'll take before Nintendo adds a software check so you can't have the European version outside of Europe beyond short term travel?

[–] dorkage@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Apple did this exact thing on iPhone and 3rd party stores so I would be surprised if this wasn't already baked into the firmware on the Switch.

[–] djdarren@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago

I was on holiday on Greece when they dropped the iOS update that opened up third party app stores, so installed it over shitty wifi to see what I could install.

Nope, my account is British, so no go.

Fuckers.

[–] dasrael@lemmy.zip 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Such a dick move keeping it EU only, and also not surprising... Nintendo is hostile towards its fanbase and always has been.

I went PC-only several years ago and haven't looked back.

I'm done with consoles. That does mean missing out on some games, but interesting games are already coming out faster than I can play them.

[–] binux@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago

Nintendo can just eat a dick, seriously. I’m gonna pirate their games to my heart’s content, they can throw as many little hissy fits as they want about it.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 353 points 2 days ago (11 children)

Maintaining two product lines simply out of spite really is just such a Nintendo thing to do.

[–] mecen@lemmy.ca 3 points 22 hours ago

Being anti consumer is more profitable than making 2 product lines. Remember if you live in other countries not in EU you are inferior because Nintendo just told you so.

[–] ilickfrogs@lemmy.world 122 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I have never and will never pay for a Nintendo product because of shit like this. Doesn't mean you can't play Nintendo games though 🏴‍☠️

Fuck Nintendo.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (6 children)

yep.

I've not given Nintendo money for a long ass time, because of their idiotic insistence on choosing the most selfish, customer hating path at every fork in the road they come to.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Glitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com 66 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Seriously, just do the right thing. Goddamn

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dan@upvote.au 37 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It's the Apple approach: Implement consumer-friendly policies only in regions that require it by law. Apple mostly do it with software though, for example only allowing third-party app stores in EU and Japan.

Plenty of US companies do something similar with subscriptions too. California mandates that any subscription you create online must also be cancellable online, and so some companies (like New York Times, SiriusXM, gyms) only show their simple online cancelation flow to Californians. Everyone else must jump through hoops like use live chat, call them, cancel in person, etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] morto@piefed.social 127 points 2 days ago (10 children)

For everyone who thought eu legislation would force corporations make better stuff globally, that's how much they care about you.

And people still buying from nintendo is really disappointing

[–] radiouser@crazypeople.online 49 points 1 day ago

I thought EU legislation would make better stuff in the EU and it has.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It does it's just Nintendo going out of their way to be awkward even to their own detriment.

Look at Apple, everyone gets USB-C iPhones now they could have made a USB-C version for the European market and a mag-safe port for other markets but that would have meant two different power boards and different body designs but each market which wasn't worth it. Nintendo however have decided to actually put the cost into making two different body moulds and two different circuit boards one for non-replaceable batteries and one for replaceable batteries.

Nintendo have been anti-consumer for a long time but I'm surprised that they're willing to waste money on it.

[–] BigJohnnyHines@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think this is giving Apple too much credit, they played the largest role in the development of USB-C’s design. Started putting it on their MacBooks and IPads pretty early. They were more likely just trying to avoid another bad press cycle like when they switched to lightning. As we can see with the App Store and browsers they absolutely will be anti-consumer when they don’t think their is any real risk to them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 60 points 2 days ago (10 children)

You can't fucking replace the batteries on switches?!

Why do you assholes buy these consoles? Seriously.

[–] phx@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

I - way back when - bought a Switch 1 because it played a bunch of the games that I could easily involve my kids/family in, and can come the times I've used it on battery with one hand.

However, that was also before the Steam Deck became a thing and haven't really given Nintendo my patronage since.

The Deck also has an internal-only battery but replacing that at least is fairly straightforward (I have not needed to do so but was in the area when upgrading the storage card).

[–] shaztopher@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago

I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but you can’t replace batteries on most modern portable computing devices these days.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Probably because of Mario and Zelda. Which is 100% legit.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was considering buying a switch 2 for a couple of the exclusives, despite my prior beliefs, but this confirms that I shouldn't have even considered it

fuck you Nintendo, stop disrespecting me as a customer

[–] one_old_coder@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago

We'll be able to torrent all those "exclusives" in one or two years. No need to give Nintendo any money for being scumbags.

[–] LemmyEntertainYou@piefed.social 58 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Nintendo really dropping the ball at every opportunity. Life long Nintendo fan here and I'll never buy anything from them ever again.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] nuko147@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] wizardfrag@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because only the EU is legally requiring it

[–] filcuk@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 day ago

They're not willing to give a pinky to other countries. They'd rather have two assembly lines. I hope the law spreads, followed by the same happeningto Nintendo's butthole.

[–] EtzBetz@feddit.org 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because they only are doing the minimum needed changes to align with the law. Other countries don't have the law, so they don't do it there. Same game as with Apple.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

On the one hand, yes, this is the minimum. On the other hand, they’re making their supply chain more complicated by carrying 2 different versions with different parts etc.

So in that sense they’re going out of their way to be assholes.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Thats been Nintendo's modus operandi for at least the past 15 years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] areakode@riskeratspizza.com 72 points 2 days ago

Ah, man. All the US got was a price increase! But, to be fair... Art of the Deal... /s

[–] auzy1@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago (8 children)

I used to be loyal to Nintendo

No idea why anyone still supports them after the joycons were never really fixed on switch 1

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›