That's totally going to be applied without bias
this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2025
62 points (98.4% liked)
politics
26585 readers
2367 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
"Supporting AI subsidies isn't political"
Get ready for the conservative jagoffs to start painting themselves as the exclusive victims, much like they still do when it comes to social media platforms - "mah kawtehnt iz gettin shadoah banned, ya'll... " and something something argle bargle Hunter Biden's "laptop". And something something argle bargle ermagawd, I wasn't able to say just whatever crazy shit I wanted on a private platform when it came to Covid conspiracy theories! How is this even America?
“In July, the Trump administration signed an executive order barring "woke" AI from federal contracts, demanding that government-procured AI systems demonstrate "ideological neutrality" and "truth seeking." With the federal government as tech's biggest buyer, AI companies now face pressure to prove their models are politically "neutral."
^^^ This is where trump face plants. Unless OpenAI straight up programs ChatGPT to lie or avoid answering anything that could be seen as negative for the right. None of this pressure from Trump is gonna matter. The AI is still going to seek the most accurate answers, which almost always leads to a pro liberal position.
Even if they program it to avoid answering potentially damming question about the right, users just keep pressuring it, and it eventually folds.
The LLM will always seek the most average answer.
Close, but not always. It will give out the answer based on the data it's been trained on. There is also a bit of randomization with a "seed".
So, in general it will give out the most average answer, but that seed can occasionally direct it down the path of a less common answer.
Fair.
I tell a lot of lies for children. It helps when talking to end users.
Isn't it kinda hard for LLMs to be programmed to not just point them towards leftism in that case? Right wing ideology isn't based in established truths, it's based on whatever the individual thinks at a given time subject to radical change. Leftism having consistency that science and academia offer means it is the obvious citation for most political facts if the model was going to choose an angle. Exception perhaps being anticommunism since it's highly established in history books as justification for the Korean and Vietnam wars.
Grok is pro Nazi now. Also says more inaccurate things. Supposedly it's modeled on musks tweets. So it's not too hard.
That’s good. But it’ll still be the same type of answers. The left/liberals always win these ChatGPT debates, simply because the AI has to find you the most accurate FACTS and data it can find. Which almost always leads to at the very least, a pro-liberal answer. If anything, ChatGPT favors Liberal and Pragmatic ideals over anything else.
This would hurt conservative ChatGPT users, unless OpenAI straight programs it to lie.
Get ready for demands that ChatGPT is trained only on utter dreck like Conservapedia.