this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
218 points (86.8% liked)

politics

26585 readers
2003 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Feel this is a good accompanying piece for all the folk insisting on caping for a Blackwater merc wth a nazi tattoo because he said something they liked.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do you think he's lying about having the tattoo already covered with different tattoos?

TBH I don't really care that much for the same reason I didn't care about 1970s Joe Biden fighting desegregation: people can change.

[–] pregnantwithrage@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean I like this guy's message and he has been in front of this controversy from the start so that's a good sign.

I warn you that sometimes these candidates can 180 on you.

Tulsi Gabard was a left adjacent alternative to Sanders and Warren until she didn't find a path to victory and went to the "I left the left" play book. That one stung quite a bit for me.

John Fetterman was a blue collar pro union candidate until he had a giant stroke and still beat Dr. Oz and after that race has been a conservative in every but his party affiliation.

Kirsten Gillibrand was a strong progressive senator from New York that took over Hilary Clinton's position and eventually became a democratic mouth piece that Schumer and the rest of the party rot has been known for.

The point is that these people have vested interests that don't align with working American's and this guy seems to be genuine which is why CNN and main stream media has had a hate boner for this guy.

That doesn't make him instantly the hero but usually if these outlets are hating someone they are a threat to the establishment.

Use critical thinking and listen to arguments that make sense with research and history.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Tulsi Gabbard was outed as a russian asset really early in her career. I can't find some of the older articles but the allegations have been around for almost a decade now.

She was never Bernie Adjacent. Maybe Jill Stein adjacent. She's the congresswoman version of a Tankie, pretend to be left to make the USA look bad, dive head first into authoritarianism at the first opportunity.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lettruthout@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (4 children)

The fact that CNN and the DNC don’t like him makes me like him even more. ‘Will contribute again soon.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] answersplease77@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (7 children)

forget the rape and racist comments and tattoos which he keeps saying he did all these things when he was drunk;

isn't there any other canidate who didn't keep participating in war crimes for 13 years and still does not see anything wrong with it? giving him the best benifit of doubts, the guy is an emotionless conciousless psycopath. he will lie to tell you whatever you want to hear. people with a resume like his killed themselves from the guilt of profiting and participaring in shamed invasions and from ptsds of seeing civilians die while he is proud of it.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 5 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Archive link to avoid that cancerous website?

[–] seathru@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 month ago

https://archive.ph/N9y0k

Providing that really should be a rule.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mhague@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Hegseth has shitty tattoos but we talk about him leaking chats, shit policy, chastising the troops, being a sloppy drunk. Lots of REAL reasons to dislike Hegseth.

But this guy... people just bring up his tattoos?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] khepri@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I sure would love to see some of the "many black and brown" military members who he claims are casually rocking SS lighting bolt tattoos lol

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›