this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2025
1755 points (99.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

27690 readers
223 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Apparently a page from an internal IBM training manual. Some further attempts at source it

(page 3) 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I feel this way about things like companies, too. It must always be human beings that bear the personal responsibility for an organization’s crimes, not “the company” alone. When money can pay in lieu of personal responsibility, then there is no justice or accountability.

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't think this is wise at all.

Its just people putting into words their wish to be able to punish and appoint blame above their wishes to be pragmatic.

If software is better at something, there is no reason to be mad at that software.

More than that, the idea that the software vendor could not be held liable is farcical. Of course they could be, or the company running said software. In fact, they'd probably get more shit than managers who regularly get away with ridiculous shit.

I mean wage theft is the biggest form of theft for a reason, and none of the wage thieves are machines (or at least most aren't).

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Almost everything you said here is wrong. Much of it dangerously so.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip -2 points 1 month ago (10 children)

A computer can 100% be held accountable. Someone made the decision to put a computer in charge. That person is 100% responsible.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›