this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2025
-16 points (21.4% liked)

Technology

77084 readers
2444 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Could space-based data centers be the answer to Earth's energy and cooling challenges? NVIDIA's H100 GPU is leading the charge in orbit.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

By harnessing low-cost, nonstop solar energy and avoiding land use and fossil fuels

  1. "low-cost" - Nothing about launching data centers into space is low cost

  2. "nonstop solar energy" Continuous solar energy is certainly nice, but that is a pretty minor buff compared to current ways of making power. If you think nuclear or solar+battery is expensive, go calculate the price for space-based solar per GW...

  3. "avoiding land use" - We have a fuckload of land outside of cities, build them outside of cities... Datacenter land use is removing a cup of water from the ocean.

  4. "avoiding...fossil fuels" - You can achieve that on earth, nuclear or solar+battery...

In summary, this is probably the dumbest way to build data centers. It's stated goals are better accomplished on land with nuclear or solar+battery. It really just feels like venture capital money trap.

[–] thejml@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

It takes a lot of fossil fuels to push things to LEO let alone higher.

[–] flango@lemmy.eco.br 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

According to the International Energy Agency, the world’s data-crunching infrastructure is set to consume as much electricity by 2030 as the entire nation of Japan. Data centers also require enormous amounts of water for cooling—each day, a single 1-megawatt data center consumes as much water as about 1,000 people living in the developed world, World Economic Forum data suggests.

Also, goodbye stars, only datacenters and space junk now.

[–] PiraHxCx@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The map of space debris looks scary because each is displayed as the size of a country, while all together they would fit inside a single stadium.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Even a single bolt is not exactly fun when it hits you at several km/s

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

Ok, new app: estimate debris weight category, multiply with speed of debris, display dot size according to result.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago

Boo, the IEEE is shoveling Nvidia too?

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

This will be another massive fucking failure in the AI space.

Instead of making these dumbass and inefficient stacks they've all built this crap on MORE efficient, they're like "Space is cold...sounds good."

This planet is doomed.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

data centers wouldn’t … require as much energy and water for cooling. They wouldn’t release warming greenhouse gases into the atmosphere either.

How about you do AI via solar panels on earth instead? Oohh, it doesn't scale you say? Too expensive you say?

[–] giacomo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

so we will have to travel to space to kill the ai?

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

Space Cowboys here we go!

[–] Sims@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

I read 6+ m ago that China are already doing tests with both deep sea and space compute. Nvidia isn't leading.

Also: "With Starship, we’re expecting launch costs much lower.” Starship ?? Okay, then it will never happen.