Chulk

joined 1 year ago
[–] Chulk@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

And he wants person 2 to be desperate for person 1's job

[–] Chulk@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

If you stoop to their level than you are no better than them

Trump and his ilk are undermining the law to cleanse the US of those they deem undesirable. This guy could undermine the law to save those people.

There's a bit of a difference between those two types of people.

Additionally, If the law is so easily discarded by those in power, then maybe the law isn't worth defending at all. His activism would have been more effective as a sitting judge. To me he seems like a conservative judge who wishes conservatism still had a mask to hide behind.

[–] Chulk@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago

Like they did when 8 senators worked with republicans to kill the minimum wage increase.

Same thing happened with the Obamacare public option if I remember correctly. It's such an obvious pattern but people refuse to see it for what it is.

How many times do we have to witness the rotating villain game in the Democratic Party before we realize that's all the party is at this point. Its an illusion of resistance to fascism that protects structures of power and prevents any real change from happening.

[–] Chulk@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

And you’ve never hit a cat that was hiding under your car? Are you sure? How can you prove it? Have you gotten out each time you drove away to make sure there wasn’t a cat left behind?

I don't find this convincing. Have you asked the Waymo Taxi the same thing? I can check if I've run over a cat, and I'm naturally Inclined to care. I can't say the same about a robot. Especially one that isn't open source.

If they can avoid animals now (which they can, and do), they can improve that detection and/or logic for cats that have disappeared under the car and not reappeared. That’s not even an assumption, much less a “big” one.

I develop software for a living. It is a big assumption to think that this will be fixed with a software update. I don't know why you act as if it's a sure thing.

I personally don’t like the idea of driverless cars.

And there is your bias.

Yes I am biased against driverless cars. They are a new technology that is being tested without our consent, and they are dependent on corporations rather than humans being held accountable when things go wrong (something that we currently struggle with as a society). The fact that you think I should default to the contrary is strange to me.

No one argues self-driving cars are “needed.” The point is, they are a significant improvement over humans when developed correctly.

I'd rather gravitate towards a driverless society where we invest in public transit and infrastructure rather than further ingraining cars into our society and adopting private companies (who use us as unwitting beta testers) as the solution to our problems.

How are people this fucking stupid? Really? I don’t want you to answer that. I would need some rational and intelligent discussion on the subject.

You need to calm down. Attacking my intelligence isn't helping your argument. I think I'm done engaging with you now.

[–] Chulk@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

This, at least, can likely be remedied fleet-wide and permanently with a software fix.

Oh? That seems like a pretty big assumption. Even if the company themselves said that a software update could fix running over a living creature, I would be skeptical.

These people are just looking for an excuse to rail against automation

Excuse or valid criticism from a negatively affected community? I personally don't like the idea of driverless cars. I don't think they are at all necessary to society. I don't see them as inevitable infrastructure or even a good path forward. I don't think my stance is unreasonable.

as if a human driver would have definitely seen the cat.

There are plenty of cats in my neighborhood and I've never hit one. I'd expect an automated vehicle to drive better than a human, not worse.

You talk about people "railing against automation" but is it more productive to make reflexive excuses for its failures? The fact of the matter (IMO) is that we shouldn't be beta test subjects for these companies and this new technology.

Also, keep cats inside.

This I can agree with.

[–] Chulk@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

The civil war is inevitable and has already started. The instigators are being hired by ICE.

[–] Chulk@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

While I agree that JD Vance is a huge piece of shit, he is not on Dick Cheney's level. Dick Cheney practically altered the course of history and put us in a timeline in which a Trump presidency was even possible. Most of the evil shit that Trump and Vance carry out today was architected by Cheney. With that said, I'm sure Vance will get there some day, given his connections to Peter Theil.

[–] Chulk@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's a 40 series GPU, so pretty new. That's encouraging. Maybe I will try dual booting first.

[–] Chulk@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Do you have an AMD gpu? I'm running Nvidia GPU using windows 11 and I'm hesitant because I've heard people say that Nvidia poses problems.

[–] Chulk@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This guy's job is kidnapping fathers from home depot and separating them from their children. He likely does it with a smile on his face. But when he's caught driving absolutely wasted with his kids in the backseat, he pulls the "my kids are my world" sob story. Get fucked dude. Hope your wife gets everything in the divorce.

[–] Chulk@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The sooner you realize that the call is coming from inside the house, the better. We're dealing with a revived KKK and a government that openly supports them. These people are very capable of running their own psyops.

[–] Chulk@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What motive would a leftist possibly have for murdering ICE detainees?

view more: next ›