GameGod

joined 2 years ago
[–] GameGod@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Licensing representation matters

It doesn't, because they're the copyright owners. Think of their software as dual licensed: They run it themselves under a proprietary license, under which they reserve all rights. That has nothing to do with the AGPL version that they license to you. The AGPL doesn't take away the rights they have as copyright owners, nor does it preclude dual licensing.

(Are you a bot? Your reply is written like ChatGPT, and it has that self-defeating logic that ChatGPT has sometimes.... eg. you wrote that you disagree with me, but then parroted the exact thing that I said.)

[–] GameGod@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is flat out wrong. If you're the copyright owner, you're not licensing the code to yourself. The AGPL is the license under which they're making the open source version available to YOU. The version they run themselves is proprietary.

[–] GameGod@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This guy Ontarioiates

[–] GameGod@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Look into DeltaChat

[–] GameGod@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

Literally nothing in this quote makes any sense. It's 100% bullshit FUD that these sketchy VPN companies use to convince non-technical people to use them, like virus scanners back in the day.

Your ISP doesn't get any ad revenue or tamper with your traffic. Everything is HTTPS encrypted now and cannot be modified by your ISP (at least without you seeing a giant warning in your browser). Your ISP has nothing to do with the ads you see on the web.