StellarExtract

joined 2 months ago
[–] StellarExtract@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Gozz is correct. You're misunderstanding the nature of a digital signal. What the author did was convert a digital signal to an analog signal, store that analog signal on a bird, then record that analog signal. Whether it was redigitized after the fact is irrelevant. It is not a digital process end-to-end. This is the same as if I were to download a YouTube video, record that video on a VHS tape, then redigitize that video. Not only would the end result not be a bit for bit match, it wouldn't be a match at all despite containing some of the same visual information, because it would be the product of a digital-analog-digital conversion.

[–] StellarExtract@lemmy.zip 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

For a shitposting community, it's amazing how many people here don't understand shitposts at all.