Site-to-site and individual client setups are not mutually exclusive. They can co-exist.
I have Wireguard on both my phone and laptop - and tailscale should work the same way - which I only activate when I'm away from my home network.
You could even set it up where each "roaming" device is always connected to their "home" network by VPN, which uses site-to-site to further route the traffic where it needs to go.
I recommend looking into setting up site-to-site VPN configurations between routers at each location. I have this set up between my home network and my parents' network.
Once you have it properly configured you can simply have the router itself handle routing of specific traffic over the VPN connection, instead of needing each device to connect to the VPN individually.
it's a bit more complicated to set up and maintain but not anything outrageously complex, and absolutely worth it for your use case IMO
Hmmm. If that's true then maybe "Big Balls" by AC/DC wasn't about fancy parties 🤔🤔🤔
The problem isn't the concept of qualified immunity, it's the implementation and application.
You realize this is the exception in the US, not the rule, right?
it's not going to for either of them
it never does lol
I'm feeling really prescient because I finally decided to sell most of my NVIDIA and gaming sector stock literally on Tuesday.
Though it turns out even today's correction just brings us back to where we were earlier in the week, for the most part. We'll see how things go Monday...
I work on software security (not it/infosec) and deal with this constantly. Bad stuff didn't happen so we can scale back security, right? No, shit for brains, either the bad stuff didn't happen because we prevented it, or the bad stuff just hasn't happened yet because the vulnerability wasn't discovered, or worse still, the bad stuff DID happen and we haven't been informed yet. Either way, please do not make my job harder.
Anyone who knows anything about what a large language model is already knew this.