one_knight_scripting

joined 2 years ago

I think that if someone (even ai) is analyzing my documents, then they are bypassing my permissions and looking despite the fact that it is supposed to be private. Basically if ai is looking at my files, I don't care if it isn't running locally, it is bypassing my permissions to my automated stock trading algorithms. I know security isn't exactly Windows strength anyways, but accessing my files without my consent or knowledge is a nail in the coffin for me. Granted, you can disable it, I might point you in the direction of winutil by Chris Titus, but I would bet money that a Windows update will re enable it without consent or permission.

[–] one_knight_scripting@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

With an Nvidia GPU, I would recommend Nobara over Bazzite becomes it comes with the various drivers.

[–] one_knight_scripting@lemmy.world 117 points 1 month ago (21 children)

Ok, guys. I'm reading some of these replies which are saying the amount of outrage is out of proportion. I have to disagree with that. I don't want an AI running on my PC that is monitoring and learning about my shit. I didn't want that data saved even locally, let alone the monetization of that data. I don't want to be paying for power of a device that is turning me into someone else's paycheck.

Can you turn it off? I believe you can. But I also believe that doing it manually would be incredibly annoying since that does go with a lot of past practice. I also get it would reactivate itself after major updates, like how Edge keeps reinstalling.

Are there other solutions to my Microsoft issues, yes. Chris Titus Tech comes to mind.

But overall, the Windows ecosystem does not feel right to me anymore. Could other people still use it, yes. Am I going to stop them, not intentionally. But my Arch gaming PC runs games better than the same machine running Windows. I've always entertained the idea of a full switch, still have a Windows 11 dual boot and haven't officially done it yet, but with this the moment feels right. At least for me, hopefully you can understand that.

Not if you need custom error bars on a scatter plot in Excel.

[–] one_knight_scripting@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

IOT Enterprise LTSC fully works for running Windows games. It just doesn't have a lot of the bloatware. I've tried it and I'm dual booting with Arch.

If it is just meant as a steam machine, I recommend looking at Nobara for Nvidia GPU and Bazzite for AMD GPU. I will admit that I haven't tested vr games yet.

Personally, I'm maining Arch and it plays most games in HDR at 4k 120Hz. My Windows is so I have access to Microsoft Office.

Hypervisor Gotta say, I personally like a rather niche product. I love Apache Cloudstack.

Apache Cloudstack is actually meant for companies providing VMs and K8S clusters to other companies. However, I've set it up for myself in my lab accessible only over VPN.

What I like best about it is that it is meant to be deployed via Terraform and cloud init. Since I'm actively pushing myself into that area and seeking a role in DevOps, it fits me quite well.

Standing up a K8S cluster on it is incredibly easy. Basically it is all done with cloud init, though that process is quite automated. In fact, it took me 15m to stand up a 25 node cluster with 5 control nodes and 20 worker nodes.

Let's compare it to other hypervisors though. Well, Cloudstack is meant to handle global operations. Typically, Cloudstack is split into regions, then into zones, then into pods, then into clusters, and finally into hosts. Let's just say that it gets very very large if you need it to. Only it's free. Basically, if you have your own hardware, it is more similar to Azure or AWS, then to VMWare. And none of that even costs any licensing.

Technically speaking, Cloudstack Management is capable of handling a number of different hypervisors if you would like it to. I believe that includes VMWare, KVM, Hyperv, Ovm, lxc, and XenServer. I think it is interesting because even if you choose to use another hypervisor that you prefer, it will still work. This is mostly meant as a transition to KVM, but should still work though I haven't tested it.

I have however tested it with Ceph for storage and it does work. Perhaps doing that is slightly more annoying than with proxmox. But you can actually create a number of different types of storage if you wanted to take the cloud provider route, HDD vs SSD.

Overall, I like it because it works well for IaaS. I have 2000 vlans primed for use with its virtual networking. I have 1 host currently joined, but a second host in line for setup.

Here is the article I used to get it initially setup, though I will admit that I personally used a different vlan for the management ip and the public ip vlan. http://rohityadav.cloud/blog/cloudstack-kvm/

[–] one_knight_scripting@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Interesting. One other option is to use OrangePi for the server. OrangePi has ARC over HDMI and that would count as an input.

I did choose the WiSa surround sound system linked. I'll cannibalize it later to make better speakers. I like it because it is audio at 24 bit/96kHz. It also just uses the HDMI ARC.

Radio signal(I'm a comm/nav aircraft mechanic, I had to know):

  • 5 GHz spectrum
  • Fixed latency of 2.6 ms
0
DIY Sonos Project (lemmy.world)
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by one_knight_scripting@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
 

Hey Self Hosted!

Got a shower thought I wanna bounce off youse guys. It's half-baked but itching to become real: DIY Sonos-like surround sound using Raspberry Pis (or maybe other SBCs if Pi's not cut out for it). Need your brains to kick things off!

The Vision:

Server Pi

  • Acts as the brain. Takes 5.1 audio input from the TV (SPDIF? HDMI? Still figuring that out).

Client Pis

Wireless speakers running balenaSound or similar. Each handles a specific channel (front left, rear right, etc.). I do picture each of these being connected to a amplifier board. With some fancy wiring to give Raspberry pi voltages and power required for the amplifiers. (Something like this: https://a.co/d/fwkXuCm)

The Hurdles:

5.1 Audio Input

Can a Pi even handle 5.1 audio input? Do I need a fancy sound card/HAT? Or should I ditch the Pi for something beefier?

Channel Remapping Sorcery

Wiring all speakers the same (e.g., left channel only) but using Linux wizardry to assign which channel each speaker plays. Like, plug in a "rear right" speaker, tell the Pi "yo, you’re rear right now," and boom—it works. Possible? Or am I dreaming?

Why? Swapping speakers without rewiring = less headache. Plus, modularity.

First roadblock: Getting clean 5.1 into a Pi. Second headache: Software channel routing.

Anyone tackled something like this before? Am I reinventing a wheel that’s already on fire?

Edit: I think I may actually have found a solution even cheaper and I intended. Has anyone here ever heard of WiSa? Long story short it is a solution for Wireless Audio Cinemas. Mostly it is used in very expensive speakers, I'm talking like $5K USD for a whole system. However. I have found a much cheaper solution: https://a.co/d/fXkaMEX. This would be a good starter point for me because the server side already does everything that I want it to. The client side(speakers) are just about there... But I want to see better drivers and amplifiers. If I were to purchase this, I would use it as is initially, but eventually cannibalize the WiSa adapter, attach it to a strong amplifier, and mount the result in a better set of speakers.