this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2026
486 points (98.8% liked)

People Twitter

10156 readers
626 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
486
Statisticians, is this true? (infosec.pub)
submitted 1 week ago by cm0002@infosec.pub to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
80 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Genuine question: what's confusing about this post?

There are some that are confusingly structured, but this one should be quite obvious

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Obvious would be top to bottom. You know, like how every human reads.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

For replies, yes. And that is the case. But the first one is a quote, not a reply

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 days ago

And it makes sense to put the reply before the thing they're replying to.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

You have to read the posts and then put them in order yourself. I see these a lot and I'm still only ever like 90% sure I'm ordering them right.

The other commenter is right, its a stupid way to list a chain of events considering its out of order and doesn't even start with "1".