Hard Pass

8 readers
0 users here now
Rules
  1. Don't be an asshole
  2. Don't make us write more rules.

View hardpass in other ways:

Hardpass.lol is an invite-only Lemmy Instance.
founded 11 months ago
ADMINS

hard pass chief

1
33
It's pepper fever (media.piefed.social)
submitted 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) by Tundra_Lifeform@piefed.social to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
 
 
2
 
 
3
 
 
4
 
 
5
133
Mission accomplished (media.piefed.zip)
submitted 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) by inari@piefed.zip to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world
 
 
6
98
submitted 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) by Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
 
 
7
 
 
8
 
 
9
10
11
 
 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/33746

The extremes to which the Republican Party will go to sway the 2026 elections in their favor was highlighted again on Sunday after US President Donald Trump said he will sign no other legislation into law this year until the SAVE Act—a bill that would deeply erode voting rights and threatens ballot access for tens of millions of Americans—is passed by Congress.

"It must be done immediately," Trump declared in a characteristically unhinged social media post on Sunday, referring to the SAVE Act, versions of which have passed the Republican-controlled House but so far stalled in the Senate.

"It supersedes everything else. MUST GO TO THE FRONT OF THE LINE," Trump continued in an all-caps tantrum. "I, as President, will not sign other Bills until this is passed, AND NOT THE WATERED DOWN VERSION - GO FOR THE GOLD: MUST SHOW VOTER I.D. & PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP: NO MAIL-IN BALLOTS EXCEPT FOR MILITARY - ILLNESS, DISABILITY, TRAVEL: NO MEN IN WOMEN’S SPORTS: NO TRANSGENDER MUTILIZATION FOR CHILDREN! DO NOT FAIL!!!"

Voting rights experts and Democratic lawmakers have denounced the SAVE Act as a dangerous threat to millions of eligible voters, calling it a clear effort by the GOP to tip the scales in their favor by depressing voter turnout in 2026 and beyond.

"In every form, the SAVE Act would require American citizens to show documents like a passport or birth certificate to register to vote. Our research shows that more than 21 million Americans lack ready access to those documents," warned Eliza Sweren-Becker and Owen Bacskai of the Brennan Center for Justice, which advocates for robust voting rights, in a blog post last week.

"Roughly half of Americans don’t even have a passport," Sweren-Becker and Bacskai continued. "Millions lack access to a paper copy of their birth certificate. The SAVE Act would disenfranchise Americans of all ages and races, but younger voters and voters of color would suffer disproportionately. Likewise, millions of women whose married names aren’t on their birth certificates or passports would face extra steps just to make their voices heard."

In response to Trump's threat on Sunday, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) characterized the SAVE Act as "Jim Crow 2.0" as he condemned the president and his GOP allies.

"If Trump is saying he won’t sign any bills until the SAVE Act is passed, then so be it: there will be total gridlock in the Senate," said Schumer. "Senate Democrats will not help pass the SAVE Act under any circumstances."

Melanie D'Arrigo, executive director of the Campaign for New York Health, said Sunday that the SAVE Act—which Trump said last week must be passed "at the expense of everything else"—is not a voter ID bill, but rather "voter suppression" legislation bill masquerading as a solution to a problem that doesn't exist.

"If it was a voter ID bill, it would provide people with the proper IDs to vote, with no barriers — but it doesn’t," noted D'Arrigo. "The voter fraud rate is .0001%, and this bill would potentially prevent up to 69 million women, 40 million who don’t have access to their birth certificate, and 140 million without a passport, from voting."


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

12
46
Trans Masc(Rule)ine (media.piefed.ca)
submitted 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) by BinzyBoi@piefed.ca to c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 
 

Made this to tease a friend who recently got top surgery.

Technically this is a re-post, as this didn't seem to federate the first time around for some reason.

Edit: testing if an edit makes the post federate

13
 
 

Can anyone recommend some IDEs that don't use AI, not owned by awful corporations, and preferably no online features at all? Of course I am aware of vim, neovim, etc. but ideally I'm looking for a gentler entry from other popular IDEs.

14
53
submitted 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) by ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
 
 

Drywall never felt such fear.

15
 
 
16
 
 

I'm trying to get back into making art and I know having a decent place to share it with others is essential. No point in making something nobody will see.

I'm hoping someone here knows about a decent platform to share content, which also has a No AI stance (and hopefully, measures taken against ai mining).

So far the only one I heard of was Cara, and it's not bad but it didn't hook me. Maybe I should give it another go, I haven't checked it in a long time. Last time I checked, it relied on artists using nightshade and other poisons, but iirc those methods are always lagging behind in the arms race, and require the artist constantly re-updating with newly poisoned versions of their work. This can get very time consuming.

I know Artstation lets you label no ai on your work, but I don't think that actually does anything that protects my work from getting mined.

One important thing is that I need to be able to post with my real name, so I don't believe another community here will be the final answer. However, having said that, if you know of any solid art or artist communities where these topics are discussed frequently feel free to point me that way. I would still benefit from getting in touch with people in a similar situation as myself.

Please help me recover some faith in humanity... Thanks

17
18
19
154
Me_irl (piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone)
 
 
20
 
 
21
 
 
22
 
 
23
 
 
24
 
 
25
 
 

honestly, the gambling fits

view more: next ›