this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2026
258 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

87507 readers
3906 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Make no mistake, this is 100% going to be Comcast's alternative to more expensive surveillance options a la Flock, or workplace presence sensor arrays.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] generic_computers@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 hours ago

And you thought having to use Comcast was bad enough!

[–] Kalon@feddit.online 5 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

I had (still have) my own modem, but switched to their cheep "prepaid" Xfinity NOW service. Fast enough for my needs but I'm annoyed to learn I can only use the refurbished modem they have given me. No idea if its capable of presence monitoring but Its one of their old ones and I'm sure it already leaks metrics I'd rather not share.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Wrap it in copper and run a hard line to a second router.

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 3 points 10 hours ago

OPs article links to another article at TechCrunch . That article states:

As first reported by The Verge, the new Wi-Fi Motion feature works for advanced Xfinity gateways XB7 and newer models and is opt-in, which means users can choose whether to switch on the feature in the Xfinity app.

So it seems like for now it's only this one model that can do it, if you believe them. Frankly, I wouldn't sniff that opt-in claim either because I'm fairly certain I know which orifice they pulled it out of.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

If it's just a modem with no WiFi, then it's not capable of this specific thing.

[–] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 4 points 13 hours ago

I like my no BS ISP that allows me to use any retail router matching their specs. One thing I just don't have to worry about.

[–] renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net 87 points 1 day ago (8 children)

PSA: If you can afford your own a retail router, it’s always a better idea than using the one provided by your ISP. Make no mistake, Xfinity is absolutely collecting (and probably selling) data on the traffic of every device on your network.

[–] DesertCreosote@piefed.blahaj.zone 13 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I work for a different large ISP who provides modems and routers to our customers, but not this specific feature (being a bit vague because I know at one point mentioning the company’s name on social media would result in the post being reviewed by the social media team/referred to security for anything discussing internal processes, and while Lemmy probably isn’t on their radar I’d rather not risk it).

The amount of data we can see if you’re using our routers is pretty crazy, and most people have no idea. We can see exactly what you have on your network and what it’s doing. If you’re just using the modem and not the router, we have much more limited visibility. We don’t have the capacity to monitor everything everyone is doing all the time, so if you’re using your own equipment (and you’re not using our DNS service), it’s unlikely we have much data on your activity. Storage in the scale needed to store what everyone is doing gets expensive.

I’ve always used my own equipment, and I make sure everyone in my family has their own equipment as well. I would absolutely advise against using your ISP’s equipment if your goal is privacy.

[–] Monument@piefed.world 6 points 13 hours ago

I encourage everyone with the ability to do so to at least try to run their own networking, or even just periodically examine the logs. The weird things I’ve discovered about random devices on my network have made me seriously question what the fuck companies are doing.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.today 31 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Ubiquiti isn't perfect but they make a really good product and you don't have to connect it with a cloud

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Xfinity is absolutely collecting (and probably selling) data on the traffic of every device on your network.

They're doing that anyway via the modem. Unless you are tunnelling everything your ISP sees every byte you send.

You can also get your own modem, but that doesn’t change the fact that yes, you need to use a VPN for any external traffic you don’t want your ISP seeing.

However, ISP controlled routers provide them direct visibility into your LAN, which they otherwise wouldn’t see. This gives WAY more detailed information about you and your behavior, i.e. the original article.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (11 children)

Regardless of the basic privacy invasion that we all know Comcast is doing. Buy your own cable modem and router. Comcast charges you to use theirs, so they pay for themselves in a couple years.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago

They've changed it since covid so now if you use their modem/router combo, you get unlimited data for free. If you don't use their modem and router, you have to pay $30/mo to remove the data caps or keep yourself under 1.2TB for the month.

[–] dan@upvote.au 13 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

They used to charge you more for unlimited data if you didn't use their modem. Renting their modem plus getting unlimited data was $30/month, but just getting unlimited data with your own modem was $50/month.

Not relevant any more though, as (at least in my area) they completely removed the data caps.

I'm so glad I have a local ISP that provides 10Gbps for cheaper than Comcast's 1Gbps.

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Did they change that really recently? That was still a thing two years ago with Comcast. It is the only reason I still have their modem.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago

The clue is the last line of their comment where they say they have a competitor offering 10Gbps which is why Comcast removed the data cap in their area. AFAIK it's still in place where I'm at because the only other option is CenturyLink 100mbps DSL.

[–] dan@upvote.au 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

In my area, they removed the data caps last year, when they also rolled out the higher upload speeds (eg the gigabit plan now has 350Mbps upload speed instead of 25Mbps). I don't think they've rolled that out everywhere though.

They also have a habit of keeping people on old plans that are either slower or more expensive. If you're still using Comcast/Xfinity, check their site and see what they offer to new customers at your address. (you may need to use an internet connection other than your Comcast one, otherwise they may detect that you're an existing customer)

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago

Good call, I will do just that until I have a better option in ISPs. Fiber has been rolling out around here, but it has been annoying build around my specific area.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago

It's always been a ripoff from the start. The modem / router is far cheaper than whatever they charge you to rent it over a year. Additionally they were broadcasting public wifi hotspots from your rented modem for a while (probably still are) and now this. Having said that, walk into any random friend's house, and what will you see? A big stupid rented Comcast modem.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Guess I'm injecting metal into my exterior walls and lining my blinds with tin foil

[–] TwodogsFighting@lemdro.id 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yup. Turns out the tin foil brigade were right the entire fucking time.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yep it will get used by advertisers to know how many times you get up while watching netflix, or by police to know when to conduct a raid.

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

The internet is increasingly a weapon

[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

The Dark Knight surveillance tech is real life now. We're screwed.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 1 points 15 hours ago

Hopefully my personal router isn't being used by the ISP for this sort of thing. Odds are, they probably just do it, because capitalism is sucktackular by default.

[–] tynansdtm@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 day ago

I remember the scientific article of this technology as a proof of concept. Honestly it didn't take an ISP very long to ~~weaponize it~~ offer it as a service.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 5 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (3 children)

If Google and Apple start doing this wirh Bluetooth and WiFi on Location Services, they're not that far off the The Dark Knight sonar scene:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRELLH86Edo

[–] bless@lemmy.ml 5 points 19 hours ago

Except that TDK is fiction, so the billionaire has morals

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

That's what they are deploying. This has been possible for awhile, but has recently gotten much creepier: https://groundy.com/articles/wifi-densepose-full-body-tracking-through-walls-using-your/

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

I did like that old Reddit post where someone did the math on the charges he’d get for this and everything else was a rounding error compared to the hacking charges

load more comments
view more: next ›