this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2025
292 points (98.3% liked)

Fuck AI

4728 readers
278 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 66 points 1 month ago (21 children)

“I considered the LLM as a collaborator,” Cantera added. “My productivity was off the charts.”

The LLM was a collaborator alright — a collaborator with his boss.

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 57 points 1 month ago (20 children)

People who use slop keep saying stuff like "my productivity grew by leaps and bounds" and such. Yet I've never seen substantiation of productivity gains with LLMs: not with colleagues who gave it a try (at my boss' behest until he realized it was idiotic), nor with any actual formal management studies.

Are there any peer-reviewed studies showing productivity going "off the charts" by use of LLMs? Or is this all anecdote from people who were never productive in the first place and can thus make any claim they like about their productivity? (After all 1000× nothing is ... nothing.)

[–] okamiueru@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I haven't seen anything yet. At work, the ones that praise AI the loudest are exceptionally highly correlated with the people who lack a good understanding of the core concepts. The ones that just float around cargo culting and looking busy by making noise.

That said, LLMs are still useful tools, that are highly misused. What they're useful for, is a lot less than most think. The user needs to be the expert. If they're not, they'd be better off reading a book on the matter (and how things are looking, it might have to be one written before LLMs came out).

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 6 points 1 month ago

Exactly this...

Also checking work of AI is a lot harder than checking the worker of a junior employee.

Junior employee makes predictable mistakes and improves over time.

These models improve alright based on benchmarks but they fundamentally will never know right from wrong and the whole point of being a professional is being able to tell that. Being able to catch being wrong and correct. Stand your ground when you know you know you are right..

These systems can't do any of it.

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 5 points 1 month ago

… and how things are looking, it might have to be one written before LLMs came out …

Oh, do I ever feel this!

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)