this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2025
690 points (87.7% liked)

Memes

53336 readers
493 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 6 points 2 days ago (4 children)

The success of diplomacy and peaceful protest hinges on the existence of a credible threat that the alternative (war and riots, respectively) will be worse. Even if a (mostly) peaceful solution should be found, I suspect there will have to be some measure of violence to get that point across.

As others point out, the elites won't go down quietly, and as long as there are bootlicks willing to fight on their behalf, they'll rather let their bootlicks die than make concessions.

So while I don't think violent revolutions are good for their own sake, they may be a necessary evil for good ends.

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago (3 children)

what about peaceful revolutions (as long as they DON'T even escalate)?

[–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I know of no revolutions that didnt use force or the credible threat of force, because the ruling class would always rather escalate than voluntarily give up their power.

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

thejre's the people power revolution in the phillippines back in 1986

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)