this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2026
477 points (99.6% liked)

Fuck AI

5268 readers
2237 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Potatar@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

AI is not complicated (hard but solvable with time and effort), it's complex(easy but numerous and their interactions make it hard)?

sigmoid(aX+b) is not that complicated

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That wasn‘t even the argument. The argument is that AI is a resource waste; it uses too much power and water for what is a shit return.

Who cares how complicated it is.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

once it no longer needs massive amounts of expensive resources, what then?

[–] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 7 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Its already here, it's called the average Redditor.

This isn't a joke. You already know what a low power LLM is, its a 40W human brain with high school level knowledge and a confident human tone writing on Reddit. But not the entire brain, only the natural language and superficial knowledge part... Meaning having the human is better anyway.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

high school level knowledge

I love your optimism. These are the people who add an S to mass nouns like 'email', and who pluralize with an apostrophe. A successful high-school education isn't being shown, there, at least in terms of literacy (admittedly, we are represented by how we write).

Is it correlative, in that many Redditors live in a country where 54% of them do not communicate above a 6th-grade level?

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 14 hours ago

How about Louisiana or Mississippi or Missouri high school level?

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

That’s a massive assumption on your part. Exactly how do you propose that the entire architecture of LLM’s be restructured to not be the massive resource hog desperately seeking a profit that it is? Mind you, it’s shit now and you’re basing your argument on a hypothetical “maybe”, like maybe you’ll win a massive lottery payout tomorrow.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

You make a compelling argument, it will never be achieved. I am convinced. Not one human is capable, nor are one thousand humans. It is unsurmountable mountain.

It is the year 5000. Aliens look at the wreckage of earth. They see what little remains of our meager existence. The goal that haunted humanity for all eternity, a doomed plan from the start, only ever resulting in certain failure? making chatbots use as much energy as a gaming rig. It never happened. It was... impossible.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Oh good. If you resort to hyperbole to prove your argument you’ve already lost.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Okay, since its obviously hyperbole that it isnt possible, its a potential outcome so lets return to my original question (deemed a massive assumption on my part by you):

once it no longer needs massive amounts of expensive resources, what then?

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

So copypasting your question does what…? If you can’t be bothered to think through my answer and think of a different question, then go re-read the answer I already gave you.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

Okay, its called a hypothetical, which you ignored. I therefore ignored your bad faith attempt at diverting the discussion at hand. Hypothetically, what happens when it is energy efficient? Its not impossible. I am only saying, sure do whatever you gotta do to regulate ai now, but it will eventually get there, and then what?

[–] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

It is, in fact, impossible. lmfao.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Then, hyperbolically, and hypothetically, the entire electronic and computing world is massively changed and not just AI. Because such a change wouldn’t be limited to AI’s use. I wish you wouldn’t keep playing with the conditions of the argument myopically in an attempt to be right. If you don’t like someone criticizing hyperbole and hypotheticals, don’t use them.

[–] sakuraba@lemmy.ml 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Don't bother discussing, they will delete their comments once they lose the argument

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

Thanks for the heads up. Guess I’m done here.