this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2026
443 points (99.6% liked)

Fuck AI

5268 readers
2361 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Oh good. If you resort to hyperbole to prove your argument you’ve already lost.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Okay, since its obviously hyperbole that it isnt possible, its a potential outcome so lets return to my original question (deemed a massive assumption on my part by you):

once it no longer needs massive amounts of expensive resources, what then?

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

So copypasting your question does what…? If you can’t be bothered to think through my answer and think of a different question, then go re-read the answer I already gave you.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

Okay, its called a hypothetical, which you ignored. I therefore ignored your bad faith attempt at diverting the discussion at hand. Hypothetically, what happens when it is energy efficient? Its not impossible. I am only saying, sure do whatever you gotta do to regulate ai now, but it will eventually get there, and then what?

[–] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

It is, in fact, impossible. lmfao.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Then, hyperbolically, and hypothetically, the entire electronic and computing world is massively changed and not just AI. Because such a change wouldn’t be limited to AI’s use. I wish you wouldn’t keep playing with the conditions of the argument myopically in an attempt to be right. If you don’t like someone criticizing hyperbole and hypotheticals, don’t use them.

[–] sakuraba@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Don't bother discussing, they will delete their comments once they lose the argument

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Thanks for the heads up. Guess I’m done here.