this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2025
732 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

77084 readers
2869 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 11 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean, from his perspective, having nothing to lose (besides his soul, ofc, but that's for silly people πŸ™„), of course!

[–] count_dongulus@lemmy.world 10 points 4 weeks ago

You think the Palantir CEO has a soul? You gaze into that orb once and it's game over

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Of course he does. But false dichotomy aside, China has a good chance "winning the AI race" anyway. Given their existing work, the investment they're doing in higher education, the additional internationally trained talent they get every year, and the industrial base that lets them make cheap energy and hardware, I think at the very least China has a decent chance to create equivalent tools at a lower price than whatever the US AI industry creates. If they come out with a competitive hardware and sell it at lower margins, along with free models as they already offer... I think a lot of firms and governments would opt for that instead of paying for NVIDIA and OpenAI.

[–] Onyxonblack@lemmy.zip 9 points 4 weeks ago

No it's not

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 9 points 4 weeks ago

Not MY Surveillance! YOUR Surveillance!

-Palantir CEO!

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 9 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

If any of you dumb fucks don't think we already live in a surveillance state, you are part of the problem

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 9 points 4 weeks ago

The biggest conspiracy theory of my lifetime was the government was intercepting all communication and it was proven completely true.

Spoken like a true surveillance-state shill.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

anything is preferable to people like you

[–] hornedfiend@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 weeks ago

what an absolute piece of human turd. most likely stinks like shit around him, every time he opens his mouth.

[–] Tangentism@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 weeks ago

CEOs are getting too comfortable again. One needs to be pew-pewed in the streets to thin the herd and guarantee next year's harvest!

[–] korendian@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 weeks ago

Those are the only two options???

[–] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I know I’m supposed to be better than this, but what the absolute fuck is wrong with bro? His entire vibe is off. What the fuck is with that hair? Why is he calling everything baller? This is some Zuckerberg lizard person shit all over again a person who thinks that hair works and talking like that sounds fucking cool can’t be an actual human what in the weird ass shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bravesirrbn@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

What an absolute cunt

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

These things are completely orthogonal.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 4 weeks ago

seems like less of a threat than US bases surveillance/MOSSAD assisted tech.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 5 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

I think billionaires swinging at the gallows is better than Palantir existing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] XLE@piefed.social 5 points 3 weeks ago

Alex Karp thinks people only care about one kind of surveillance. And he thinks he will alleviate our fears if he gives us a pinky promise not to surveil us in that one way.

That way is cheating.

He later brings this up again, saying that most surveillance technology isn’t determining, β€œAm I shagging too many people on the side and lying to my partner?” Your guess is as good as any as to what that’s all about.

Well, thanks for clearing that up, Alex. That was indeed my sole concern.

(The rest of the article is full of indecipherable quotes from Alex, which demonstrates you don't need to be smart to be rich.)

load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί