this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2025
712 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

77084 readers
823 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Following the same legislative and narrative pattern as the EU for “Chat Control”, similar laws and rhetoric are now cropping up in the US. The narrative is “save the children from porn” but the action is censorship, mass surveillance, and the elimination of privacy on the Internet.

As of this writing, Wisconsin lawmakers are escalating their war on privacy by targeting VPNs in the name of “protecting children” in A.B. 105/S.B. 130. It’s an age verification bill that requires all websites distributing material that could conceivably be deemed “sexual content” to both implement an age verification system and also to block the access of users connected via VPN. The bill seeks to broadly expand the definition of materials that are “harmful to minors” beyond the type of speech that states can prohibit minors from accessing—potentially encompassing things like depictions and discussions of human anatomy, sexuality, and reproduction.

Wisconsin’s bill has already passed the State Assembly and is now moving through the Senate. If it becomes law, Wisconsin could become the first state where using a VPN to access certain content is banned. Michigan lawmakers have proposed similar legislation that did not move through its legislature, but among other things, would force internet providers to actively monitor and block VPN connections. And in the UK, officials are calling VPNs "a loophole that needs closing.

(page 2) 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rainbowbunny@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 week ago

Think of the billionaires!

[–] GaryGhost@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Good luck with enforcing that, websites are likely to block access from Wisconsin. Isp's in Wisconsin will just block vpns or not do anything at all. If the whole world banned vpns then we'd just all use the next work around.

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Don't worry once this bites them in the ass by exposing something they have said is bad they will get themselves an exception.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

How the fuck do they plan on monitoring VPN traffic? Isn't the whole point of a good privacy-oriented VPN is that they don't log traffic? How can they monitor something that doesn't exist?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Loco_Mex@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Wow, they're really grasping at straws now, aren't they? Banning VPNs in the name of protecting children is just another way to censor the internet and infringe on our privacy.

Was wondering how long it would be until they did this.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›