this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2025
846 points (98.5% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

35926 readers
1704 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 23 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I still can't believe that the united states had multiple lunar landing missions and several people set foot on the moon... and now the US military and civilian space agencies are reliant on a company run by a Nazi manchild and that cannot send spaceships and satellites beyond low earth orbit...

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

To be fair to Musk (LOL!) NASA was chock full of former Nazi scientists back then. You don't believe me? walk into NASA sometime and yell "Heil Hitler!" WOOP! They all jump straight up! R.I.P Jessica Walter.

[–] MajorasMaskForever@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

In all seriousness going to LEO gets the job done the vast majority of the time, medium and high earth orbit have very few use cases with the exception of geostationary which SpaceX has gone to.

Going to the moon is very energy intensive and you don't get a ton of benefit for it so there's no real point to going there. Apollo was a jobs program and a dick waving contest with Soviet Russia to prove who could put the biggest nuke anywhere on Earth. Going to the moon has very little scientific/practical value outside of political stunts which Apollo and Artemis programs definitely are

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

It was supposed to be our shipyard to build bigger ships than we could lift to orbit, until the dick waving started. NASA had much much bigger plans than just walking around on the moon.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 25 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Shareholders don’t need to make profits anymore because they literally own everything and are actively participating in a coup to keep it that way.

[–] SeventySeven@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago

Me when any software/hardware/game breaks:

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Everything for the shareholders!

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 96 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Actually, everything is working as intended

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I feel like the graph looks like that no matter what years you set as the first and last in the range, the scale just gets larger as time goes on, as if printing money to solve problems just does that

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world -5 points 6 days ago

The only point here, as always, is that everybody and anybody who thinks that this chart and only this chart is what matters, is objectively a fucking idiot who has disqualified their own opinion, along with those implying it is a real, serious opinion, which it is not.

I feel like the tiny little uptick in the red line at the end is just a lie to try to give us a smidge of hope.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This single diagram really tells you all you ever need to know. And yet a lot of people in the bottom 50% think that the gays or refugees are to blame for their problems.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago

Oh dear god I had not seen that graph updated in some years.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (5 children)
[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 38 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

LBJ wanted to have social spending and have a massive knockout punch in Vietnam. Instead of a knockout punch, the War turned into a massive quagmire. It was costing the US a fortune, but LBJ didn't want to raise taxes, so he printed money. Nixon got elected and doubled down on the War and using inflation to pay for it. Then the OPEC oil embargo hit and inflation went through the roof.

Jimmy Carter's plan [controlled by Fed chair Paul Volker] solved inflation, but by the time it kicked in Carter had been replaced by Reagan. Reagan deregulated a lot of industries and let them run wild.

In 1968, 'middle class' was defined as one Union job supporting a family of four. At that time $1 million was a vast fortune. By the time Bush Sr. was out, 'middle class' meant two incomes to run the home, and $1 million was what a rich guy paid for a party.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Whenever you want to understand the state of the USA, consider George Bush, president, father of George Bush, president.

We're a fucking Middle Eastern dynastic fiefdom, with fucking nukes.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The funny thing is that Bush Dr. castigated Reagan's tax cuts as 'voo-doo economics' when they were running against each other in the primaries. Once Reagan won the nomination, Bush signed on whole heartedly

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

The intricacies of their complex don/sub dynamic are expertly explored in the hard-hitting documentary Wet Hot American Summer: First Day of Camp.

[–] Gonzako@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Apparently it's so common a question it's made into a domain https://wtfhappenedin1971.com/

a domain with spurious conclusions

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Slovene@feddit.nl 88 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's because of all the wokeness.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 58 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

As all things are wont to do in the long run.

One day, you too will be food for worms, who will then shit you out (well, your soft tissues at least).

[–] harsh3466@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago

Can't fucking wait.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 2 points 6 days ago

Oh may the worms lords take me soon!

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Obviously. Once we ban trans girls from playing volleyball, all our problems will be solved.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 57 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"We have finally eliminated planned obsolescence. We have replaced it with instant obsolescence."

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 5 days ago

retro obsolescence with over the air "updates"

[–] Sergio@piefed.social 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And yet the somehow charge more for it.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 17 points 1 week ago (13 children)

Tuned for optimal exploitation.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Counterpoint: Linux on the desktop works now

[–] groet@feddit.org 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Linux is famously both American and Corporate /s

But yeah sytsem76 and valve are both american and valve is corporate. And around Lemmy you would think they are the only ones responsible for the Linux boom.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zier@fedia.io 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well that's good news. Now I can finally relax. I'm going to go lay down in my back yard, that is nothing but dry dirt, and stare up at the pollution clouds in the sky. Good time, good times.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"Product hoarding" conflicts with wealth hoarding. The only logical solution is to make less durable products that quickly wear out with frequent use.

That way consumers are forced to spend more and contribute more to the hoarded wealth of individuals who know very well they won't be able to spend their fortunes before they die. However their desire for more and more wealth to hoard is limitless because it acts as a useless status symbol amongst other wealth hoarders.

When consumers become concerned about skyrocketing cost of living and wealth inequality, the wealth hoarders will remind them they're lazy and greedy. If they didn't want to be poor they should have worked harder (like them) or been more careful not to spend all their money on "frivolous purchases."

However if consumers don't spend enough money on frivolous purchases, they're not being smart, they're "product hoarding." When consumers don't have money to spend, but the wealth hoarders continue to churn out shitty products that they know nobody will buy, the economy will collapse.

The wealth hoarders could afford to take the hit. It might even help them understand cause and effect, so they don't just keep making the same mistakes in the future. They could even use some of their hoarded wealth to get themselves out of the hole they dug by just giving it to the consumers to spend on their own products. But instead, they're usually just given a bailout because they're too big to fail.

After all, the economy would collapse without them...

load more comments
view more: next ›