this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2025
154 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

4728 readers
331 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

used to think that the hype surrounding artificial intelligence was just that—hype. I was skeptical when ChatGPT made its debut. The media frenzy, the breathless proclamations of a new era—it all felt familiar. I assumed it would blow over like every tech fad before it. I was wrong. But not in the way you might think.

The panic came first. Faculty meetings erupted in dread: “How will we detect plagiarism now?" “Is this the end of the college essay?” “Should we go back to blue books and proctored exams?” My business school colleagues suddenly behaved as if cheating had just been invented.

Then, almost overnight, the hand-wringing turned into hand-rubbing. The same professors forecasting academic doom were now giddily rebranding themselves as “AI-ready educators.” Across campus, workshops like “Building AI Skills and Knowledge in the Classroom” and “AI Literacy Essentials” popped up like mushrooms after rain. The initial panic about plagiarism gave way to a resigned embrace: “If you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em.”

This about-face wasn’t unique to my campus. The California State University (CSU) system—America’s largest public university system with 23 campuses and nearly half a million students—went all-in, announcing a $17 million partnership with OpenAI. CSU would become the nation’s first “AI-Empowered” university system, offering free ChatGPT Edu (a campus-branded version designed for educational institutions) to every student and employee. The press release gushed about “personalized, future-focused learning tools” and preparing students for an “AI-driven economy.”

The timing was surreal. CSU unveiled its grand technological gesture just as it proposed slashing $375 million from its budget. While administrators cut ribbons on their AI initiative, they were also cutting faculty positions, entire academic programs, and student services. At CSU East Bay, general layoff notices were issued twice within a year, hitting departments like General Studies and Modern Languages. My own alma mater, Sonoma State, faced a $24 million deficit and announced plans to eliminate 23 academic programs—including philosophy, economics, and physics—and to cut over 130 faculty positions, more than a quarter of its teaching staff.

At San Francisco State University, the provost’s office formally notified our union, the California Faculty Association (CFA) of potential layoffs—an announcement that sent shockwaves through campus as faculty tried to reconcile budget cuts with the administration’s AI enthusiasm. The irony was hard to miss: the same month our union received layoff threats, OpenAI’s education evangelists set up shop in the university library to recruit faculty into the gospel of automated learning.

The math is brutal and the juxtaposition stark: millions for OpenAI while pink slips go out to longtime lecturers. The CSU isn’t investing in education—it’s outsourcing it, paying premium prices for a chatbot many students were already using for free.

(...)

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At this point I feel like any title could be "AI is destroying _______" and it would be correct. I hate this timeline. :/

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe someday AI will destroy AI. But it's more likely to destroy humanity.

[–] hedge_lord@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Good news! LLMs are destroying LLMs through model collapse. Basically, LLMs are being used to spew information onto the internet which unintentionally "poisons" new LLMs created with that data.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07566-y

Will this change anything about how it's used? No, of course not! Adding "AI" makes the line go up so it is always a good idea (sarcasm)!

[–] presoak@lazysoci.al 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The university died when it ceased to be about education. It's about money now. AI fulfills that agenda just fine.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are you kidding? Universitys in modern times have always been about money.

[–] presoak@lazysoci.al 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There was a time when universities were about learning. For the first couple months at least.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago

Yeah in antiquity...

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I find it so upsetting that most of university’s focus is building marketable skills. That should be the side result! The main result should be in-depth education in a field of your choosing, while building critical thinking skills. Not “let’s give you 5 more years of fact based learning while cherry picking the facts to tailor it your future job”

[–] presoak@lazysoci.al 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think that AI is making the agenda of these institutions more visible. Schools that don't care about teaching. Students that don't care about learning. Businesses that don't care about the well-being of customers or employees. It's all becoming more obvious.

Maybe we'll come up with new stories to cover that up in the next couple decades. Then we can go back to pretending

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

I find it so upsetting that most of university’s focus is building marketable skills.

... for the administrators.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They want us ignorant, quiet, and compliant.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

All they are doing is showing people where they can do shit in private. See you in the woods.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Maybe we can make education free and make the objective of education to learn instead of get a piece of paper that is the prerequisite for having a job that isn't blatant exploitation.

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Was talking to a journalism student at a CSU. He mentioned they were pushing ChatGPT on students and faculty right as they were also talking about academic integrity and plagiarism. And in journalism class they were teaching about proving sources and truth vs propaganda.

The disconnect is amazing.

[–] SunshineJogger@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago

AI will stay. The question is when it will finally pop and all the nonsense people are trying to force it to do dies.

It's useful if used right.

Its damn annoying and damaging if used wrong.

Like the internet.

I recall people once regarded fiction / creative writing as the start of degraded reading, undermining what readers are.

Looking at how dumb a LOT of people have become AI can also lead to an increase in knowledge because it reduces the difficulty to basic information.

As long as it answers: "the world is round" and such, it can only get better in terms of general populous education.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

AI is ~~Destroying~~ Contributing to The Ongoing Scam of the University and Learning Itself

[–] racketlauncher831@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Are those the worms from Carrion?

[–] brianpeiris@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Excellent read, thanks for sharing.