this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

75682 readers
3011 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I suspect that this is the direct result of AI generated content just overwhelming any real content.

I tried ddg, google, bing, quant, and none of them really help me find information I want these days.

Perplexity seems to work but I don't like the idea of AI giving me "facts" since they are mostly based on other AI posts

ETA: someone suggested SearXNG and after using it a bit it seems to be much better compared to ddg and the rest.

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zante@lemmy.wtf 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not just you.

DDG has deteriorated to absolute nonsense, I’ve used it for years and years.

Recently gave startpage another go - maybe marginally better but still really poor

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I switched to DDG right after Google added the ai answers to search and in baffled by how fast DDG seemed to go down hill. Just a few months ago it was still giving me on point results on the first try, now it almost feels like I'm using one of those malware search bars from back in the day.

[–] zante@lemmy.wtf 1 points 11 months ago

yes - it’s a recent thing, no more that a few months I think

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

It's not just you. Search got worse, and it did so intentionally.

Ed Zitron lays it all out really well, with all the receipts, but the basic version is this; Google has an incentive to make you search more for the same things, because then they can show you more ads. And google is, first and foremost, an ad delivery company. Every "product" they own is an ad delivery vehicle. It's not just AI slop that made search based; Google made search bad, and everyone else followed suit, to a greater or lesser degree.

[–] anttifantti@sopuli.xyz 1 points 11 months ago

I feel like it’s especially bad if you are searching for anything related to a marketable product. I tried searching ddg for information about using a surge protector with halogen bulbs and all I got was pages and pages of listicles on “best halogen lights 2024” full of affiliate links.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The whole internet is in the process of being filled with garbage content. Search engines are bad but also there's not much good content left to find (in % of the total)

[–] d7sdx@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

The Internet is dead ™

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You know what I miss? Search engines that honored Boolean operators. I am often looking for niche results and being able to -, ! and NOT is incredibly useful. But that's just not a thing anymore. I know part of it is that SEO includes antonym meta data that ruins this but it would still be helpful on occasion.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

they're pretty bad, but ddg at least feels like I'm getting actual results.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

DDG often gives me results for individual words of the search but not results for all of the words in that order for which to have contextually relevant results.

I often find myself forced to brave the shitshow that is google search.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

have you tried the duck assist thing yet?

If you're trying to talk to the search engine more like a chat assistant, that sort of response might be what you're looking for.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Fuck Duck Assist all my homies hate Duck Assist and I keep having to turn it back off again.

Whoever made it should get cancer and not have their children show up or call them back.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

haha, whaaat why?

I just saw it for the first time today, it seems to mostly quote incredible sources rather than amalgamating responses.

you got some issues huh, poor fella?

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm sorry I hurt your feelings and made you want to defend an LLM that approves copy pasted wikipedia snippets, but maybe you should go eat some ass?

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

"I'm sorry I hurt your feelings"

I feel only pity for you.

reading your comments is like watching a diseased guinea pig nibble on its own scabs.

"an LLM that approves copy pasted wikipedia snippets"

duckduckgo's llm tool offers relevant information from credible sources.

that is good.

Good luck unbunching those panties.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You know that's just Bing, right?

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

is it? that kind of makes sense, because I still use Bing occasionally while Google is completely out of rotation, although I don't find Bing as good as duckduckgo.

edit: it is not! looks like the DuckDuckGo search engine is an aggregate of hundreds of search engines, including their own duck duck bot, excluding Google but including some Bing results.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It is, and it's not just the search engines to blame.

The content out there is incredibly spammy. It doesn't pay to create good content. It pays to make a pool of AI gunge based on what people search for and then stick ads on it.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Spam sites laden with key words and massive SEO to farm advertising dollars from clicks long predated AI

It doesnt help that big search engines like google have realized people will go as far as page 2 or 3 to find the results, so intentionally worsen their search results to increase ads being served.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

they overengineered it. they now give you results they think most people want instead of what you searched. for google, it helps to switch on verbatim mode and set your country to something weird like Azerbaijan

[–] dwindling7373@feddit.it 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And where do you switch it?

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

under the google search field is a row of buttons. one of them, usually far right, is "search tools". sometimes you have to scroll the button row to reach it. it has a verbatim switch that makes google not replace your search terms with what it thinks most people mean when entering that

[–] BigBootyBoy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And where do you switch it?

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

I made a screenshot for you:

[–] hannesh93@feddit.org -1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I'm very happy with kagi at the moment. Just crossed one year using it as my main search engine last week and don't see why I would go back.

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Having to signup and login to a search engines sounds like an annoying hassle

[–] uzay@infosec.pub 1 points 11 months ago

It is. And it's also terrible for privacy, but people do it with google as well.

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@lemmy.today 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Signing up and logging in isn't a problem imo. I wouldn't even mind if I had to pay for searches, but I'm not going to make it a subscription service. Unless they add an option to do something like buy 1000 searches that never expire, its not something I'd considered. I do think they beat out competitors like google with their results pretty consistently though based on the trial.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm not gonna subscription my heated car seats but search is a service that costs an ongoing amount to provide. The subscription isn't significant, it's $5 a month for 300 searches (or $10 for unlimited).

I know we've been conditioned to expect search for free, but if we want to get away from the "the user is the product" model then I think it's a good thing to have a subscription to a service that has ongoing costs to provide.

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@lemmy.today 1 points 11 months ago

Up to 300 searches. I'm not asking for free. Just for it to not be a subscription. Just sell me 300 searches.

[–] tk1ll3r@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Same. Using Kagi feels like surfing the old web. The first thing I did was block all Pinterest results. That alone made every search golden. 😂

[–] ownsauce@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I hate Pinterest lol, best thing about Kagi is being able to block whole sites and it remembers your preferences. I may come back to Kagi but I didn't feel like funding their AI features development. Now Im using Searx and 4get cause they're free.