this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2025
973 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

75606 readers
2238 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.org/post/1872634

So, starting now, Google started mandating full JS for YT, effectively breaking all third-party clients and locking the site to their official client.

This reeks of DRM.

UPDATE: Installing Deno and installing yt-dlp through PyPi fixes yt-dlp but the very idea that Google is mandating JS to lock down YT in an attempt at pseudo-DRM is still crappy.

UPDATE #2: inv.nadeko.net is working again for now.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 219 points 6 days ago (2 children)

youtube has a monopoly on video content, they can (and will) do what they want

[–] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 68 points 6 days ago (24 children)

Otoh, you also have Odysee and PeerTube to move your own content to.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How about peertube fixing the discovery issues first? The platform if full of low quality content

[–] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At least it's not AI slop unlike what Google is pushing really hard on YT lately.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

At lease there is ton of quality videos and channel that you can watch in you tube unlike peer tube that 99.9% of videos are terrible quality videos. The AI slop i can simply ignore. I would like to love peertube but it is trash unlike pixeled which is not perfect and have many half backed features but I can find many great creators and great photos. Pixelfed reduced by usage of instagram by 95%

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 157 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Those are fantastic solutions if you don't want anybody to watch your content.

[–] Gutek8134@lemmy.world 50 points 6 days ago

You can post it on those first, and on YouTube a week later, the way some creators promote Nebula or their Patreon

[–] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 31 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (5 children)

At least you own your content on those platforms, PeerTube especially if self-hosted, and not Google. If you self-host a PeerTube instance using local hardware, for example, no one can take it down on a whim but you.

With YT, Google can and will nuke your channel for any reason they see fit.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 47 points 6 days ago (7 children)

The fediverse is kind of like a dandelion growing out of the cracks in a concrete slab.

Hopefully the seeds take.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nom_nom@lemmy.ml 74 points 5 days ago

Holy shit I did not realize how complex of a project yt-dlp has to be to do something as simple as download a video... Kudos to the devs

[–] art@lemmy.world 144 points 6 days ago (10 children)

Just ran am update for ytdlp and it's working again.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] carrylex@lemmy.world 67 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (5 children)

This post's title is just completely incorrect and it looks like 700+ people didn't even read the comments or the actual issue for one minute.

Good job guys!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world 44 points 5 days ago (11 children)

They're going to keep enshitifying it until they kill it completely. Them blackholes, I mean shareholders, will never have enough money.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] NovaSel@lemmy.world 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

As someone who is listening to a video on NewPipe as I type this very comment, no they did not

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Came here to say this after giving it 24 hours in case it was just lucky timing

However, now if I try to watch a YT vid in Firefox, I get the "Oops something went wrong" right when the Ad should have popped up

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] tisktisk@piefed.social 102 points 6 days ago (21 children)

Someone give it to me straight, what is the endgame of this cat and mouse game? I know yt-dlp and invidious have been quite crafty at adapting to these changes, but the scales seem to be tipping.

It feels like Google will dominate the game into submission the same way it did with AOSP and Chrome. I know I'm being dramatic but it's really starting to feel like we're being cornered into a hopeless situation

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 116 points 6 days ago (10 children)

Well the problem for google is that Youtube MUST be accessible to almost any internet user in the world - that's a key reason why it's so ubiquitous.

The reason this cat and mouse game has lasted as long as it has in the first place is because any method that is currently being quashed has a solution lying in another user agent that youtube can't kill.

If one day YT sets a "minimum requirements" page on their website to access their content, they've immediately ceded market share to the next upstart. Imagine if they broke viewing for all of the countless cheap (and e-waste) phones, tablets, low end IOT devices, "smart TVs", and so on because they place a requirement that the device cannot meet. Those users will not throw away their hardware - they'll migrate to the first available alternative way to watch content.

As long as YT caters to the lowest common denominator (Their business model essentially binds them to do so), there will always be a software/hardware environment that these tools can spoof. The moment that stops being the case, people look for other options.

A similar analogy would be how Microsoft handled the windows 11 requirements - the strict requirements locking out years upon years of hardware has resulted in a substantial amount of users finding workarounds for their machines (like windows 10 IOT LTSC), or to even jump to linux entirely. They abandoned the entry level users, so entry level users are abandoning them.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 40 points 6 days ago (2 children)

If one day YT sets a "minimum requirements" page on their website to access their content, they've immediately ceded market share to the next upstart. Imagine if they broke viewing for all of the countless cheap (and e-waste) phones, tablets, low end IOT devices, "smart TVs", and so on because they place a requirement that the device cannot meet. Those users will not throw away their hardware - they'll migrate to the first available alternative way to watch content.

This all incorrectly assumes that there exists any viable competition to switch to. YouTube ran at a net loss for over a decade to get the reach they currently have, only because Google was one of the very few companies who could feasibly afford to do so. Nobody else with the resources to compete with YouTube is willing to compete with YouTube, because of the massive cost required to get even a fraction of that user base, let alone a critical mass.

And most of the content people access YouTube for is only found on YouTube, so those hypothetical users aren't going to switch to a new platform, they're going to either just flat-out stop watching or will replace their devices.

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Users replacing their devices isn't feasible in many parts of the world, especially outside of the west.

You are correct that a service similar in scale and scope would not appear out of the aether due to the cost, but to say nothing would make a grab for those underserved users would be foolish.

Again - the entry level cost conscious users do constitute a large part of Youtube's userbase, so even if they are burdensome to support (due to ad blocking rates, required legacy features to upkeep, and so on), they are a core part of the audience that youtube serves. In an economic environment where people cannot afford to abandon their hardware, there is no chance they will opt out of receiving information and entertainment entirely because of their devices being unsupported by google's sites. They will move to the next service in the chain, either existing or new. To google's investors, that shrinkage in userbase may be untenable.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 6 days ago

what is the endgame of this cat and mouse game?

Same as usual: the mouse loses unless it assembles and unionizes with other mouses and they bring in a guillotine.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 25 points 6 days ago (9 children)

Android is different because there are no alternatives to cellphones except Apple. On the web, there are other ways to share video. So Google can maybe lock YouTube down, but it can't lock you down.

Many of us use 3rd party browsers a stop-gap measure. We'd like to leave the platform entirely, but we are still interested in some of the content there, so we're OK with the cat-and-mouse game for now, knowing that if Google goes hardcore blocking mode that we will walk away and be better human beings for it.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 20 points 6 days ago (8 children)

They turn it into an app-only platform just like with many PRC-based apps. Literally, some of those platforms doesn't even have a web or desktop mode.

I tried using Baidu Maps web to look at my old neighborhood (I was born in mainland China) for nostalgia, and the site repeatedly automatically attempts to download the .apk like every tap I make on the site. Wtf lol. The site probably detected the useragent and keeps nagging me about their app.

I tried browsing a random popular online store to see what it's like for curiosity (天猫), but it asked for a sign in. Like wut? Even Amazon, Ebay, Bestbuy doesn't do that. PRC is actually just late stage cyberpunk capitalism.

This is gonna be the future for every big-corp stuff. App only, real ID and phone number verification required. Probably even scan your face.

We need a Meshtastic-based "internet" to actually decouple from big corps have control our infrastructure to have real freedom.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] sk1nnym1ke@piefed.social 19 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Someone give it to me straight, what is the endgame of this cat and mouse game?

A mandatory account with paid subscription.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] AndyMFK@lemmy.dbzer0.com 53 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Google doing everything they can to anger everyone.

[–] NotKyloRen@lemmy.zip 19 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

I cancelled YT Premium after paying pretty much since Google Music was a thing. The price keeps going up ($14/month now here in the US), and Lite is meh even for the discounted price (e.g. no background play I think?).

They just keep building the wall higher and higher, while they survive only because creators keep filling it with content. Nobody is watching "YouTube Originals" or their first party content. YouTube exists solely because of third party creators.

Not only that but I can survive with Brave or Firefox with UBO or whatever. It's not that hard to avoid the ads, even if it's a little inconvenient vs being able to use the app.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 6 days ago (3 children)

You should remember to send all YT videos that you watch to archive.org

There are browser extensions to do this conveniently

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MystValkyrie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

I am so glad I had the foresight to use yt-dlp to back up most of my favorite videos. Not all of them, but I just thought we'd get more time.

But yeah, I knew this would happen. The age verification thing was really controversial, so Google would have had to expect that people would try to find other ways to access YouTube. They won't stop here and will go after Deno and NewPipe.

I'm pretty much done with YouTube. It's just not what it used to be. All my favorite YouTubers are either gone, have changed for the worse, or are on Nebula. It's mostly just slop, and I won't miss it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago (1 children)

New pipe and smart tube both working for me.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)

My self hosted downloader similarly didn't skip a beat.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 47 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

huh well seems like i should go on a yt-dlp binge on the wcw vault just in case for archival and historical purposes of course

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 22 points 5 days ago (11 children)

Honestly surprised YouTube hasn't just required DRM yet

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 45 points 6 days ago (11 children)

Revanced is working just fine.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 27 points 6 days ago (9 children)

This reeks of same shit different day or at least different month. Last time if I recall you had to include a valid cookie with yt-dlp.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 26 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Someone please find the Steins;Gate Wordline, I'm not really enjoying the worldline convergence, everything is turning to shit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 30 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Lies. Both YT ReVanced and SmartTubeNext have been working perfectly all day today.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)

NewPipe as well, without any update either.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Superorbit@lemmy.ca 32 points 6 days ago

Newpipe is working for me. For now...

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 5 days ago (5 children)

The day smart tube next stops working is the day i stop using youtube. I will NEVER watch a shitty youtube ad and I'm sure as shit not paying google any money whatsoever.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 27 points 6 days ago (14 children)

The alternative clients really should allow alternative sources.

Move away from relying on the evil that is google.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] cryptix@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Newpipe still working for me now?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] communism@lemmy.ml 19 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Yeah have been using https://inv.nadeko.net/ as FreeTube broke for me. Unfortunately there seems to be some kind of bandwidth throttling as I'm getting 720p videos only (my internet is fine for 1080p and I was getting 1080p on FreeTube).

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›