this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
1149 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

75606 readers
2419 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] seraphine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 52 points 12 hours ago (12 children)
[–] Blindsite@lemmy.today 3 points 3 hours ago

They exist. People just don't buy them. But there is a Ubuntu phone port you can install on your phone as an alternative to android.

https://forums.ubports.com/topic/10762/status-update-on-the-next-noble-based-ubuntu-touch-release-february-2025

But yeah it can get complicated like any Linux community project and isn't at all mainstream.

[–] hietsu@sopuli.xyz 7 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

We had a few good Linux phones back in the day but Nokia / Microsoft killed them trying to compete with iPhone OS and Android: Maemo / Meego were great but did not get a proper chance.

Jolla continued the legacy and Sailfish OS is still something worth checking out if you can find suitable hardware, or idk how complex it is to port it.

Seems to be new Jolla phone coming up at some point too: https://forum.sailfishos.org/t/next-gen-jolla-phone/23882

[–] Johnny101@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

I think Linux phones will gain some real traction within five years. Last I heard, KDE is putting great effort into making apps for Plasma Mobile

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Paddy66@lemmy.ml 10 points 10 hours ago

Contact your representative. And here's F-droid's article about it (including how to find your representative at the end of the article): https://f-droid.org/en/2025/09/29/google-developer-registration-decree.html

[–] Johnny101@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

Google’s developer verification will only run on mainstream Android with play services. It’s not supposed won’t be running in standard AOSP so the easiest solution would be to switch to a custom ROM like GrapheneOS.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 17 points 8 hours ago

They are also working to similarly kill custom ROMs. Just recently the GrapheneOS team mentioned that Google is no longer making their hardware drivers Open Source, and so compatibility with new phones means reverse engineering their own drivers - which is a big reason that custom ROMs support such narrow hardware options already and very often come with limitations and/or features that just don't work. At best, they figure out how to make it work, but it takes time and updates can lag significantly behind.

We have a lot of options on the software side for avoiding google (or android), but very limited options on hardware. We need open source mobile hardware support ASAP.

[–] coolkie@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

But remember, unlocking bootloader is harder and harder for many devices. And Google's Play Integrity and API changes makes removing trace of unlocked bootloader harder. Many apps not just banking, ChatGPT, games, some of social media is completely unusable in that scenario.

[–] cosmo@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

While true, the pool of unlockable devices are dwindling fast.

[–] Johnny101@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

True…. I heard GrapheneOS is having trouble porting to the Pixel 10

[–] hietsu@sopuli.xyz 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Also, aren’t some critical apps like banking apps starting to ban unlocked / non-stock systems? Heard someone complaining about this a while ago.

[–] Johnny101@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Yes, banking apps, streaming apps, even some shopping apps. This has been a problem for a long time. Sometimes its for “security” reasons and sometimes its simply because the app uses Play Service APIs. Another issue on de-googled systems is push notifications, though that is often fixed through alternates like Unified Push

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I don't have that choice in Denmark due to NemID.

[–] Johnny101@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Like other people have suggested, maybe get a second phone (one of those really cheap ones with play Services) and use that for that stuff, and keep your main personal phone google-free.

[–] bay400@thelemmy.club 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

At this point the solution seems to just be having a second phone for that kinda shit

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I don't like that my neighbours are noisy, guess i should get a second house for when they're shouting

[–] bay400@thelemmy.club 1 points 7 hours ago

ah yes because phones are $400,000-$1,000,000+

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

European devs: Our laws will protect us!

Meanwhile, our laws:

Article 30

Traceability of traders

  1. Providers of online platforms allowing consumers to conclude distance contracts with traders shall ensure that traders can only use those online platforms to promote messages on or to offer products or services to consumers located in the Union if, prior to the use of their services for those purposes, they have obtained the following information, where applicable to the trader:

(a) the name, address, telephone number and email address of the trader;

(b) a copy of the identification document of the trader or any other electronic identification as defined by Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council (40);

Article 30, DSA

[–] take6056@feddit.nl 2 points 4 hours ago

How is trader defined? Is it a developer that's selling apps or also one that's just providing it for free?

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 58 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Let's hope that the rest of the world, specifically Europe smash this ridiculous proposal apart for what it is. Europe has already sorted out USB-C etc. Its not perfect and they don't get everything right, but certainly big enough to make stuff right.

[–] SpaceCadet@sopuli.xyz 31 points 15 hours ago

They're too busy forcing chat control and age gates through our collective throats.

[–] kalkulat@lemmy.world 20 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yep. The E.U. has allowed itself to be dominated for too long by the US megacorps. It has the talent, ideas, and manufacturing to tell US firms to bugger off ... and the sooner, the better for us all.

[–] ghosthacked@lemmy.wtf 7 points 15 hours ago

Unless you want hillbilly outrage slop destabilising your continent, you better get control away from American tech companies.

[–] art@lemmy.world 64 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I'm starting to think these for-profit companies only care about making money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 53 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

What pisses me off it that they say they do this for security. It changes absolutely anything.

They really think that malware developers will say "oh no! I need to submit a picture of an id card to sign my malware! It's literally impossible to submit a jpg of a stolen id card, I'm ruined and out of a job!"

What does it change? Waste 20 minutes of some malware developer while they register under a stolen id? They already have a system that scans for known malware and automatically remove it.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Thing is, Play Store is already filled with malware or near-malware from seemingly verified developers. I ran into several scam clone apps just today. It's even snuck in through OEM apps.

Same on iOS, which supposedly verifies devs.

If 'verification' and curation is their idea of security, well... It appears their system is already overloaded, yet they want to expand it?

[–] fading_person@lemmy.zip 50 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It's always security when someone wants to take our freedom away. Always security...

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 27 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

Not always. It can also be about the children.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] keegomatic@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Both things can be true. It definitely is better for security. It’s pretty much indisputably better for security.

But you know what would be even better for security? Not allowing any third-party code at all (i.e., no apps).

Obviously that’s too shitty and everyone would move off of that platform. There’s a balance that must be struck between user freedom and the general security of a worldwide network of sensitive devices.

Users should be allowed to do insecure things with their devices as long as they are (1) informed of the risks, (2) prevented from doing those things by accident if they are not informed, and (3) as long as their actions do not threaten the rest of the network.

Side-loading is perfectly reasonable under those conditions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 36 points 20 hours ago

The justification is simple, I don't see the confusion, they want absolute power and for all alternatives to wither and die ? What is there not to understand ?

load more comments
view more: next ›