this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
878 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

74193 readers
3880 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zifk@sh.itjust.works 86 points 20 hours ago (9 children)

Anubis isn't supposed to be hard to avoid, but expensive to avoid. Not really surprised that a big company might be willing to throw a bunch of cash at it.

[–] sudo@programming.dev 30 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (6 children)

This is what I've kept saying about POW being a shit bot management tactic. Its a flat tax across all users, real or fake. The fake users are making money to access your site and will just eat the added expense. You can raise the tax to cost more than what your data is worth to them, but that also affects your real users. Nothing about Anubis even attempts to differentiate between bots and real users.

If the bots take the time, they can set up a pipeline to solve Anubis tokens outside of the browser more efficiently than real users.

[–] OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] sudo@programming.dev 7 points 17 hours ago

Not much for open source solutions. A simple captcha however would cost scrapers more to crack than Anubis.

But when it comes to "real" bot management solutions: The least invasive solutions will try to match User-Agent and other headers against the TLS fingerprint and block if they don't match. More invasive solutions will fingerprint your browser and even your GPU, then either block you or issue you a tracking cookie which is often pinned to your IP and user-agent. Both of those solutions require a large base of data to know what real and fake traffic actually looks like. Only large hosting providers like CloudFlare and Akamai have that data and can provide those sorts of solutions.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)