this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
273 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

74193 readers
4275 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/26297841

I'll note that the article as originally published contains a typo; Ruth Porat is the CIO at Google, not the CEO.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 35 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

There's a techbro (sis in this instance) idea that the faster we use AI, the faster AI will find a solution for climate change. The stupidity in that is that we already know the solution. We just have to execute on it.

[–] nickhammes@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

This is one of many examples of a class of problem where the technology is the easy part. There's room to improve the tech certainly, but the technology sufficient to solve the problem is already well understood.

The hard part is how to get people to actually do the necessary changes. To consume less, get fewer gas cars on the road, increase the amount of nuclear, hydro, solar, geothermal, and wind in the grid, and minimize coal and gas use. To reduce land use by cows, and increase land use by trees and native plants.

But maybe AI is the secret here. We have tools that are in the hype moment whose training data already contains several reasonable solutions to climate change. Maybe if AI "finds" the solution to climate change, people will finally listen

[–] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 5 hours ago

AI can already "find" the solution. They're not listening to it because they're looking for a magic pill that solves it without needing to change anything. We're fucked.