When something is too "on the nose," for example, it's written in exactly the way that would induce the most cheering and virality because it appeals so much to one group of people, it's worth considering it may have been written to provoke exactly that reaction.

[–] andioop@programming.dev 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Thanks!

I really wish people did not do this. This isn't something I was ever taught to look for, and I like to think I got a good education. I was taught to make sure my source is credible, to consider biases and spin and what things are facts and what is just opinion, but I wasn't taught to look for a lot of deception people call out online. But I guess I have to live with this and gain the skill to look for deception. Genuinely, thanks for helping me, since I don't think I ever would have figured out what raises "fake" flags in most peoples' heads on my own.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)

AmidFuror's description is on point and I see it as a variant of Poe's Law. Instead of sarcasm being mistaken for a real belief, it is presenting a fictional account of someone being self aware that is mistaken for someone actually becoming self aware.

There are two lines that make me absolutely certain it is written by someone who it not a vibe coder and is leaning into the sarcasm.

'pulling out my wallet for someone that knows what they are doing' implies the poster knows they don't know what they are doing
'vibe coding is just roleplaying for guys who want to feel like hackers' is a joke I've seen directed at vibe coders more than once

Keep in mind that not all deception is malicious, but most people see the word deception as having a negative implication. An actor/actress pretending to be someone else is technically deceptive the same way as whoever wrote this hilarious post. They are presenting a fictional account for an audience.

load more comments (2 replies)