this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2025
329 points (96.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

26650 readers
2087 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For anyone curious - https://flif.info/

EDIT: am a dumbass, JPGXL extends from FLIF

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] carrylex@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

But they were, all of them, deceived

For another format was made.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

One format to rule them all, One format to find them, One format to bring them all, and in the darkness bind them; In the Land of the Bay Area where the shadows lie.

[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

From what I've read, AVIF doesn't outperform JXL on any metric except browser support

[–] carrylex@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Well Google said otherwise when they removed support for it: https://storage.googleapis.com/avif-comparison/index.html

However I'm not sure how trustworty their own statistic is.

On the other hand Mozilla's PoV:

neutral - JPEG-XL includes features and performance that might differentiate it from other formats, but the benefits it provides are not significant enough on their own to justify the cost of adding another C++ image decoder to browsers. A memory-safe decoder would reduce these costs considerably, and we are open to shipping one that meets our requirements.

https://mozilla.github.io/standards-positions/

So AV1 is clearly the winner here, also because it can be used for videos and not just images.