this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2025
1046 points (99.3% liked)

Greentext

7201 readers
397 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 week ago (34 children)

I think people are confused by seeing influencers and/or rich people and thinking what they have is normal.

In the 1500s it was sun-up to sun-down, 6 days a week for the work outdoors. Once the sun set, nothing could really be done. If you were a typical peasant you couldn't even afford to keep a candle lit. So, people went back to their one-room huts with their livestock in the same room and slept and/or waited for morning. They didn't have to work Sundays, but they were absolutely required to attend church on Sundays, so it wasn't a free day. There were other days off, but many of them were days where you had to do a certain prescribed activity.

In the early 1800s it was 12 hours of work, 6 days a week. Industrial era lighting technology meant that work could continue after the sun had set, so there were no winter days where you only worked 8 hours. Also, because this was the era of the factory, people had to commute to the factory and back, so if you were lucky you had a full 10 or 11 hours when you weren't working or commuting. If you wanted to sleep for 8 hours, you'd have 2-3 hours to do your cooking, eating, cleaning, bathing, mending, socializing, etc.

Thanks to tireless and bloody protesting by labour unions, 6 days of 12 hours each was shortened to 5 days of 8 hours each. It started in Chicago. The "Haymarket Affair" was a protest that led to a riot which led to public hangings. But, eventually, as a result of that, the work day was shortened to only 8 hours. Then, in the years that followed, a 2 day weekend became standard.

It might not feel like it, but your ancestors would be jealous about how much free time you have these days. Your distant, peasant ancestors might actually have had fewer work hours. But, they only stopped working when it was too dark to do anything, and then they basically sat or slept in a tiny, drafty, stuffy, one-room hut along with their livestock until the sun came up.

If we kill and eat the rich and use their bones as decorations, it would be possible to keep a bit more of the value of our labour. But, we're nowhere near a situation where we can all live like the rich. Someone does still need to plant the food, harvest the food, pump the oil, cast the iron, smelt the aluminum, keep track of the shipping, etc. Life is hard, and has always been hard.

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (11 children)

Someone does still need to plant the food, harvest the food, pump the oil, cast the iron, smelt the aluminum, keep track of the shipping, etc. Life is hard

This is only true because capitalism is limiting technology to the point where all these mundane tasks can't be automated or improved with tech so that it can be possible for all to self-maintain. Yes, not that simple and yeah someone would need to program things and maintain things, but there's no way in hell I'm going to believe that humanity can waste so much time and money on something as unethical as AI but somehow can't come up with technology to let people maintain crops without having every piece of the puzzle we have now.

They can do it. Everybody talks about how crazy it is about how in such a short time span we've gone from flying planes to landing on the moon and it is ridiculous. It's not that inconceivable to believe that we can come up with tech to better maintain society beyond what we have now. People want to keep the status quo because they limit their minds to what has been.

Capitalism dictates that profit means everything. We don't need pot holes to be filled every other year just because people get a job. People shouldn't be dependent on such a system to survive. Pot holes can be filled with a solution that will not dissipate over time but capitalism doesn't want that. It wants to make sure there's a demand to pay someone despite the penalty of the many.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 week ago (10 children)

This is only true because capitalism is limiting technology

Capitalism is trying as hard as possible to replace people with machines, but there are a lot of jobs that machines simply can't do.

to landing on the moon

Hundreds of millions of people paid the equivalent of thousands of dollars each for a dozen men to be able to walk on the moon. "Walking on the moon" isn't some activity that anybody can do now. It was effectively a stunt to show that it could be done

Capitalism dictates that profit means everything.

Only in the eyes of communists.

[–] shaman1093@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To your last point - do you believe that profit is not valued above all else in our current society?

I'd like to understand your view here further if you're happy to elaborate

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

do you believe that profit is not valued above all else in our current society?

Of course not. Just look at a typical commercial. You're supposed to drink coke because it's an activity you can do with friends. You're supposed to buy a truck because it lets you get outdoors and go fishing. You're supposed to buy makeup so that you can look glamorous for your friends and eligible men.

If profit were the most valued thing, these commercials would be all about how drinking coke makes you more focused so you can earn more money, and how your truck allows you to take on a side hustle to make more money.

[–] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The advertisers don't give a shit about all that stuff, you're supposed to buy things to make the company money. If there was no money to he gained, they wouldn't sell and advertise it. They're just trying to convince you you need product x for activity y

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The advertisers don't care. But, the people they're advertising things to do care. For them, profit is not valued above all these other things, thus the advertisers need to target things they do care about: friends, family, status, leisure activities, etc.

[–] blind3rdeye@aussie.zone 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I agree with that. But the claim was that capitalism puts profit above all else, not necessarily that individual people do that.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] blind3rdeye@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In a similar way to how feudalism is people?

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago

Yes, all the isms are people.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)