this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2025
1046 points (99.3% liked)
Greentext
7200 readers
438 users here now
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
- Anon is often crazy.
- Anon is often depressed.
- Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Capitalism is trying as hard as possible to replace people with machines, but there are a lot of jobs that machines simply can't do.
Hundreds of millions of people paid the equivalent of thousands of dollars each for a dozen men to be able to walk on the moon. "Walking on the moon" isn't some activity that anybody can do now. It was effectively a stunt to show that it could be done
Only in the eyes of communists.
This is not absolutely true. I've seen and worked manual jobs that could absolutely be automated by a fairly simple machine. There isn't much reason to automate low-paying jobs away.
There are also a lot of pointless "bullshit jobs." ~20% of people think their own jobs are pointless.
I've been around the tech startup scene for a while now, and they often do a lot of pointless work that everyone knows isn't useful, just because they know that's what's "hot" right now with investors.
Ok, fair enough.
How many of them are right? Maybe some of them. But, a lot of people don't appreciate the whole system they're part of.
I doubt it's truly pointless. Sure, it might not end up working, but maybe the investor actually knows more than the workers. There are a lot of successful companies that I saw in their early stages and thought "nobody's ever going to pay money for that", and I was completely wrong.
To your last point - do you believe that profit is not valued above all else in our current society?
I'd like to understand your view here further if you're happy to elaborate
Of course not. Just look at a typical commercial. You're supposed to drink coke because it's an activity you can do with friends. You're supposed to buy a truck because it lets you get outdoors and go fishing. You're supposed to buy makeup so that you can look glamorous for your friends and eligible men.
If profit were the most valued thing, these commercials would be all about how drinking coke makes you more focused so you can earn more money, and how your truck allows you to take on a side hustle to make more money.
The advertisers don't give a shit about all that stuff, you're supposed to buy things to make the company money. If there was no money to he gained, they wouldn't sell and advertise it. They're just trying to convince you you need product x for activity y
The advertisers don't care. But, the people they're advertising things to do care. For them, profit is not valued above all these other things, thus the advertisers need to target things they do care about: friends, family, status, leisure activities, etc.
I agree with that. But the claim was that capitalism puts profit above all else, not necessarily that individual people do that.
Capitalism is people.
In a similar way to how feudalism is people?
Yes, all the isms are people.