this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
1212 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

75682 readers
3145 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rmrf@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why do you think they're making this arbitrary change?

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Because Google have been wanting to be closed source for years, which is why nearly all their new features since they released the Pixel have been PixelOS exclusive and not in AOSP.

They don’t care about killing custom roms, that’s just a side effect of them going closed source for their Phone.

[–] rmrf@lemmy.ml 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

What do you think the benefit of closing sourcing their software is if not to stifle competition?

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It means they can do way more features without giving away precious IP, and it also just reduces their workload. They don’t need to keep giving out their code for free. It makes their job harder.

AOSP projects are not and never have been a threat to Google. They aren’t trying to stifle them - that’s just a byproduct of not giving away their code anymore. Giving it away gives literally zero benefits to them. It might only save them 0.01%, but that’s a lot money.

[–] rmrf@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago

As someone whose job runs several FOSS projects, I think you're making up the fact that it adds meaningful workload.

I think that, for all intents and purposes, protecting IP is equivalent to stifling competition.

I think giving away code benefits the entire Android ecosystem, which might be the largest data mining operating Google has. I fully believe that's of nonzero benefit.