this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2025
1138 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

75682 readers
2898 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"No Duh," say senior developers everywhere.

The article explains that vibe code often is close, but not quite, functional, requiring developers to go in and find where the problems are - resulting in a net slowdown of development rather than productivity gains.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] SparroHawc@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Except LLMs are absolutely terrible at working with a new, poorly documented library. Commonly-used, well-defined libraries? Sure! Working in an obscure language or an obscure framework? Good luck.

LLMs can surface information. It's perhaps the one place they're actually useful. They cannot reason in the same way a human programmer can, and all the big tech companies are trying to sell them on that basis.

[โ€“] Lembot_0004@discuss.online 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Well, don't use it with new, poorly documented libraries. That is a common sense rule: use the tool where it is useful.

Somehow many LLM criticizers just claim that LLMs are shit because they can't autonomously write code. Yes, they can't. But they can do many other useful things.