this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
21 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

74024 readers
1150 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] trk@aussie.zone 8 points 1 day ago (21 children)

Crypto

Fraud

Name a more iconic duo

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (18 children)

There are only two good use cases for crypto:

  1. Financial speculation
  2. Criminal activity and fraud
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

sad thing is that it could be great as an alternative to mastercard/visa but crypto fash have just ruined any attempt to make it appealing to anyone other than crypto fascists.

[–] MushroomsEverywhere@lemmy.world 0 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

As I understand it, cryptocurrency funnily enough works awfully as a means of transaction, because the amount of processing power required to make transactions is ridiculously high.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] hark@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

If a cryptocurrency concentrates into the hands of a few, as assets tend to do in capitalism, then wouldn't proof of stake mean those few control the cryptocurrency anyway?

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 19 minutes ago

If the protocol is badly designed, yes.

In theory, the stakers should only be rewarded for correctly confirming transaction and that capital (staked tokens) should carry no votes in any protocol changes.

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You don't need crypto as an alternative to MasterCard/Visa. There are multiple national payment systems that de facto work on a public benefit basis or offer no fees or very low fees.

One major example is India's UPI:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_Payments_Interface

Even in a medium sized developing country like Ukraine, I can send anyone money (P2P, business payment, business transaction) with minimal or no fees on a near instantaneous basis off my phone.

I am not on top of recent payment infrastructure developments, but from memory this is relatively common.

No need for scam services like PayPal, Venmo.

And this has been avaible for half a decade minimum (was living in another country before then).

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)