this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2025
104 points (96.4% liked)
Technology
77084 readers
2905 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
He never said anything about being anti union. What he said was that if his workers felt the need to unionize then he had done something very wrong.
And the behind the scene stories about the workplace environment at his companies make clear just how absurd that particular line of his is.
Whenever unions, or labor organizing get brought up, he never misses a chance to take some dig at them, including his lie how he's such a great boss that his employees don't need a union.
Just like how he's such a great manufacturer that his backpacks didn't need an actual warranty.
What "behind the scenes stories" are you referring to?
Once again you misinterpret what he said about warranties. He did not say they didn't need them. He was making the point that warranties have no enforcement mechanism. And that you literally are just trusting the provider that they'll do what's in the warranty.
I don't understand how you think these two sentences are consistent with each other.
I don't know how you think they aren't so...?