this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
447 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

74331 readers
2806 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Buffalox@lemmy.world 32 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (6 children)

Yes but contrary to China, USA doesn't use government subsidies to promote their own industries, or state owned companies to spy on the rest of the world. ๐Ÿคช
/S

I hope Intel survives because a Chinese (mainland+Taiwan) monopoly will not be good, but I am so sick of American disinformation regarding China. Always blaming China for things USA has been guilty of for decades before China.

[โ€“] XenGi@feddit.org 8 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Are you sure about that? US hardware is spying on the rest of the world for decades. Cisco is in no way better then huawei.

[โ€“] Buffalox@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

Can you not see the crazy smiley? Clearly indicating the statement is crazy. It was sarcasm, but OK I'll add the /S.

Also the part that USA did it for decades before China should clearly indicate the part above was sarcasm???

[โ€“] absentbird@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Reading comprehension is a skill. It seems like some people just glance at the words and make up what they expect to see. I have no idea how your comment could have been interpreted the way they did without a total disregard for the substance. Maybe they were reading it through an auto translation? Still, seems like the emoji is pretty obvious.

[โ€“] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

I hope Intel survives

Are you sure about that? US hardware is spying on the rest of the world for decades. Cisco is in no way better then huawei.

That might be how you are supposed to read that response

[โ€“] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

OK that could have been stated more clearly, but why should I be against Intel, because USA has used Cisco for spying?

That's exactly the kind of stupid accusations without evidence I'm tired of USA making against China. Obviously the same standard goes the other way too.

And if Intel goes away, USA can still do it through AMD. ๐Ÿ˜‹

load more comments (4 replies)