this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
281 points (96.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

25705 readers
1290 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 29 points 1 day ago (10 children)

i would say why would you just not to isAdmin = true but i also worked with someone who did just this so i'll instead just sigh.

also the real crime is the use of javascript tbh

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (9 children)

That's TypeScript. I can tell by the pixels defining a type above.

[–] Maiq@lemy.lol 6 points 22 hours ago (8 children)

Was looking at it and could not figure out why their weren't any semicolon's.

[–] ScintillatingStruthio@programming.dev 11 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Neither Javascript nor Typescript require semicolon, it is entirely a stylistic choice except in very rare circumstances that do not come up in normal code.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

Explanation for nerdsThe reason is the JS compiler removes whitespace and introduces semicolons only "where necessary".

So writing

function myFn() {
  return true;
}

Is not the same as

function myFn() {
  return 
    true;
}

Because the compiler will see that and make it:

function myFn() { return; true; }

You big ol' nerd. Tee-hee.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 7 points 20 hours ago

That's terrifying, especially in JS where no type system will fuck you up for returning nothing when you should've returned a boolean.

[–] exu@feditown.com 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

Not wrong, but funnily enough, it's a linting rule win. I'd go nuts if I didn't have my type checks and my linters. My current L, though, is setting up the projects initially and dealing with the configuration files if I raw dog it, but that's a problem with ESLint configs and the ecosystem as a whole having to deal with those headaches. So in the end, the JS devs got clever and shifted the blame to the tooling. 😅

[–] Maiq@lemy.lol 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

That's good to know. Don't know how I didn't know this. Been writing JS since 2000. Always just used them I guess. Ecmascripts look funny to me without them

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

Same here. My brain interprets them as one long run-on sentence and throws a parsing error.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 2 points 20 hours ago

Hmm, a webdev colleague said he'd normally prefer without semicolons, but used them anyways for better compile errors.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)