this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
355 points (93.6% liked)

Technology

74407 readers
2958 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 96 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

“AI”

Sharpening, Denoising and upscaling barely count as machine learning. They don’t require AI neural networks.

[–] Preventer79@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Barely count or not they absolutely ruin every piece of media I've seen them used in. They make people look like wax figures and turn text into gibberish.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

They don’t require AI neural networks.

Sharpening and denoising don't. But upscalers worth anything do require neural nets.

Anything that uses a neural network is the definition of AI.

[–] ccunix@sh.itjust.works 12 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Not true

Company I used to work for had excellent upscalers running on FPGAs that they developed 20+ years ago.

The algorithms have been there for years, just AI gives it bit of marketing sprinkle to something that has been a solved problem for years.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

Well, the algorithms that make up many neural networks have existed for over 60 years. It's only recently that hardware has been able to make it happen.

AI gives it bit of marketing sprinkle to something that has been a solved problem for years.

Not true and I did say "any upscaler that's worth anything". Upscaling tech has existed at least since digital video was a thing. Pixel interpolation is the simplest and computationally easiest method. But it tends to give a slight hazy appearance.

It's actually far from a solved problem. There's a constant trade-off beyond processing power and quality. And quality can still be improved by a lot.

[–] Probius@sopuli.xyz 8 points 14 hours ago

Depends on what you're trying to upscale.

[–] hushable@lemmy.world 53 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

Sharpening is a simple convolution, doesn't even count as ML.

I really hate that everything gets the AI label nowadays

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 33 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The “ai bad” brainrot has everyone thinking that any algorithm is AI and all AI is ChatGPT.

[–] hushable@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago

just today someone told me that Vocaloid was also AI music, they are either too dumb to make some basic fact-checking or true believers trying to hype up AI by any means necessary

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

But you can use AI for that