this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
102 points (86.4% liked)

Technology

74461 readers
2227 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] salty_chief@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (23 children)

Who is downvoting progress in Cancer identification?

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Lemmings with knee-jerk reactions to anything AI related

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ohhh, this 100%

I just posted a plaque imaging study using AI analysis showing people eating the carnivore diet reversing plaque buildup by doing over a year of a strict ketogenic diet.

People I could have offended

  • AI
  • diet zealots
  • anti-keto reactionaries
  • CICO advocates

But instead I used a name without any of the trigger words and they missed it

We could rewrite this headline as:

Advanced identification techniques let doctors diagnose cancer earlier saving lives!

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

where is this study? i did a brief look through your post history but you post so much keto/carnivore stuff it’s hard to spot. it's easy to jump on the downvote persecution bandwagon without linking to it.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

The original study: [Paper] - Plaque Begets Plaque, ApoB Does Not: Longitudinal Data From the KETO-CTA Trial - 2025

The update with new AI imaging: New KETO-CTA Data - Clarification and Update on Cleerly

These didn't really get downvoted because the trigger words were avoided, and the communities are actively pruned of disinterested people, if you are looking for downvote brigading I could dig up examples for you

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I just posted a plaque imaging study using AI analysis showing people eating the carnivore diet reversing plaque buildup by doing over a year of a strict ketogenic diet.

where does it say that in the study you linked?

as far as i can tell it says Plaque progression occurred, just wasn’t linked to ApoB or LDL-C levels.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 52 minutes ago* (last edited 51 minutes ago) (1 children)

Right, so the paper using the cleerly model only showed one person reversing plaque, but the two new ai models which don't have a artificial floor, do show 30% plaque reversal. That's the second reference to the YouTube talk.

The interesting thing here, is this group of 100 people following a strict ketogenic diet, mostly carnivore, had imaging done at the beginning and the end of a year. So we can apply any models to it that we like, it's interesting that in 2/3 of the AI imaging models they show 30% of the people with plaque regression

The benefit of AI here is it makes it a quantitative analysis, assuming the AI model is stable. When we involve the humans to do scoring, there's always a question about consistency, and bias in the outcomes.

As far as I'm aware plaque regression is basically unheard of at all in any literature outside of case studies

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 2 points 28 minutes ago (1 children)

are the ai models part of a peer reviewed update to the paper?

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 24 minutes ago (1 children)

The paper hasn't been updated, the cleerly AI is part of the original paper.

The updated model data is presented in a preliminary form in the lecture, papers still pending.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 minute ago

What does Dave Feldman have to do with the study and how did he get these preliminary results?

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And someone immediately downvoted you

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Yeah, lemmy can be very emotional!

Trying to keep a community on topic without that level of gut reaction is a sisyphean task https://discuss.online/modlog/696952?page=1&actionType=ModBanFromCommunity but i try anyway

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

13 of 20 bans for "Reason: Sockpuppet". looks like some good modding you do over there.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Thank you! Identifying sockpuppet accounts took some doing, but it has been really a fun adventure. Here is my moderation policy if you want the details https://hackertalks.com/post/13655318

Thank you for your organic downvotes!

Actually its 30 sockpuppet identifications so far.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I was about to post a comment: Finally a use for AI that feels justified to spend energy on.

load more comments (20 replies)